Tuesday, August 30, 2022

Penn State and Big Ten Football 2022 Season Picks

I'm stoked. On Thursday, I'm taking my daughters (the big ones) to Penn State's opener in West Lafayette against Purdue. It's an exciting way to start the season. For the Nittany Lions team, it's also a brutally difficult way to start the season. Obviously Ohio State's tilt against Notre Dame represents the most challenging Week One opponent for a Big Ten team, but traveling to Purdue is undeniably then next toughest opponent for a team in the East.

Thankfully for Penn State, Purdue is an ideal matchup. More on that below.

Offense

The strength of Penn State's offense will be the passing attack led by sixth-year, 24-year-old QB Sean Clifford. When healthy, Clifford has been a plus quarterback. Unfortunately, the "when healthy" tag is hugely important with Clifford as injury sapped him of his effectiveness last year after a hot start came to a screeching halt with a back injury in Iowa City. Clifford's top reserves -- surprisingly, Drew Allar and Christian Veilleux -- should both be much more adept than Ta'Quan Roberson proved in 2021. But if they need to play, 2022 is probably a year full of growing pains.

Clifford gets to throw to a deep receiving corps led by NFL-bound Parker Washington who looks ready to ascend into the role left vacant by Jahan Dotson. Western Kentucky transfer Mitchell Tinsley steps into a starting role after an explosive 2021 season that included absolutely roasting Michigan State's secondary. Third receiver KeAndre Lambert-Smith grabbed the #1 jersey and looks overqualified as a third banana. Big Canadian Malick Meiga and Alabamian Harrison "Trey" Wallace should fill out the group with solid depth. If blue chipper Kaden Saunders can force his way onto the field, the group looks even better.

Just as important as the receivers, Penn State's tight end room features laughable depth with all three of Brenton Strange, Theo Johnson, and Tyler Warren deserving starter's reps thanks to their experience and pedigree. Hopefully offensive coordinator Mike Yurcich utilizes the tight ends even more in 2022.

Of course, all of the players above only get to produce if the offensive line gives Clifford time. The line has enjoyed tons of offseason helium in recent years before disappointing ever year. This year's line features three new starters in LT Olu Fashanu, LG Landon Tengall, and RG Saleem Wormley. Returning starters C Juice Scruggs and RT Caedan Wallace combined with key reserves OT Bryce Effner and G Hunter Nourzad provide just enough bodies to withstand an injury or two without collapsing. However, the starting unit needs to produce in order for the team to push for a return to double-digit wins in 2022.

They should get some help from a pair of explosive newcomers in the backfield. Gatorade National Player of the Year Nicholas Singleton brings burst to the backfield as does fellow true freshman Kaytron Allen. The youngsters were so impressive in camp that fourth-year RB Caziah Holmes transferred to Florida State last week. Hopefully Keyvone Lee is relegated to a change-of-pace role around the goalline with the freshmen carrying most of the load. 

In the end, the quarterback room should produce and the other skill players give the quarterbacks a chance to be a plus offense. This only matters if the offensive line can push defensive lines around and keep Clifford upright. Will that happen? Cross your fingers.

Defense

The 2022 defense features the best secondary I've seen in my time as a Penn State fan, even with the loss of elite safety Jaquan Brisker. Ji'Ayir "Tig" Brown is ready to step into Brisker's role as the leader of the secondary, and Penn State has two high-ceiling options to replace the other safety spot in Zakee Wheatley and Jaylen Reed along with steady upperclassman Keaton Ellis providing depth. While Wheatley and Reed are inexperienced, both come with the athletic profile desired for premium starters. Wheatley began his career as a cornerback, but he transitioned to safety given the loaded group on the edge of the defense. Joey Porter Jr. is getting first-round buzz, returning starter Kalen King should improve in his second year, former South Carolina starter Johnny Dixon was apparently a star of fall camp, and Marquis Wilson is finally back using his elite athleticism at corner after splitting time on offense. Daequan Hardy owns the slot and has produced far more than expected already. There is star power and depth in the defensive backfield.

That is not the case at linebacker. Curtis Jacobs will be expected to carry a heavy load and, candidly, he is probably the player Penn State can least afford to lose to injury. There simply isn't another linebacker ready to play with his athletic ability. Jonathan Sutherland moved up from safety to the other starting outside linebacker spot in Manny Diaz's defense, but Sutherland doesn't figure to play a ton of snaps given the amount of time that Penn State spends in a 4-2-5 alignment. Reserves Charlie Katshir and Jamari Buddin aren't pushing for reps, so linebacker depth is lacking unless and until hulking freshman Abdul Carter is ready to get on the field; so it goes with all three of Brandon Smith, Ellis Brooks, and Jesse Luketa now in the NFL. The middle linebacker battle between Tyler Elsdon and Kobe King was won by Elsdon, but MLB will likely be the weakest spot in the defense.

Thankfully for the linebackers, the defensive line figures to make life easy on the linebackers behind them. Defensive tackle PJ Mustipher was voted second-team All Big Ten by the coaches in 2021 despite missing six games with a torn ACL, speaking to his primacy on the line. Thankfully, the rest of the tackle rotation got key experience in Mustipher's absence, so Coziah Izzard, D'Von Ellis, the returning Hakeem Beamon, and even Jordan van den Berg and emergent true freshman Zane Durant provide a solid rotation at DT. The defensive end position is finally back to being in great shape even with Zuriah Fisher's injury. Between Adisa Isaac, Nick Tarburton, Maryland transfer Chop Robinson, Smith Vilbert, and incoming five-star freshman Dani Dennis-Sutton, the Nittany ends should be able to continually pressure opposing quarterbacks.

Special Teams

Colgate transfer Barney Amor is a huge step down from Jordan Stout at punter; Stout was the first punter selected in the NFL draft whereas Amor has only played one season of college football. Hopefully 280-pound freshman Gabe Nwosu gets into a game or two! Unfortunately, freshman Alex Bacchetta is headed for a redshirt season, far from winning a job.

The placekicking job is concerning. Redshirt senior Jake Pinegar has never produced at a plus level and he even lost his job last year to Stout despite Stout's continued struggles on field goals and extra points. Redshirt freshman Sander Sahaydak couldn't beat out Pinegar; there's a lot of hope here but not a lot of confidence.

Coaching

James Franklin had a good offseason as he tends to do. Hopefully he doesn't commit costly blunders on Saturdays (or a Thursday) this year.

There will likely be some growing pains in the transition from Brent Pry (now the head coach at Virginia Tech) to Diaz as defensive coordinator. Again, hopefully those aren't too notable with a pair of road trips in September.

With Yurcich back helming the offense again, continuity on that side of the ball we be a welcome change after rolling through Joe Moorhead, Ricky Rahne, and Kirk Ciarocca before Yurcich arrived last year.

Predictions

@ Purdue - W 38-20

Vegas has the line close in this one (PSU -3), but I'm not sure why. Injuries may derail the Penn State season in 2022, but the team is healthy in Week One and heads to Purdue with a decided advantage everywhere. Penn State's passing offense should carve up Purdue's secondary which will feature two new starters from the Transfer Portal. Purdue's desire to pass with sixth-year QB Aidan O'Connell plays into the strength of the Penn State defense while Purdue's miserable rushing attack likely won't expose Nittany's weak linebacking corps -- wait until October for that. George Karlaftis isn't here to put pressure on Clifford and neither Rondale Moore nor David Bell is here to prop up the passing attack.

v. Ohio - W 48-10

Penn State should easily outclass Ohio.

@ Auburn - W 35-17

There is a lot of bad energy around the Auburn program these days; not so with Penn State. I think that the Nittany Lions roll here, too.

v. Central Michigan - W 52-10

Just like Ohio, this one shouldn't be close.

v. Northwestern - W 31-20

Northwestern looked awfully spunky against Nebraska, but Penn State's secondary should make the difference here.

@ Michigan - L 17-42

Looks like another disastrous trip to Ann Arbor. Michigan will run at will against the Penn State defense, and Michigan's defensive front will likely make the Penn State offense one dimensional. That's a recipe for failure.

v. Minnesota - L 24-28

Franklin has done a miserable job over the years rebounding from a loss. PJ Fleck's squad will be well-positioned to take advantage. This one will sting, especially as the first true Whiteout failure since 2015.

v. Ohio State - L 30-23

Franklin's teams always play Ohio State tought but almost always come up just short. 2022 looks like more of the same.

@ Indiana - W 24-10

An angry Penn State team gets back on track.

v. Maryland - W 30-20

An angry Penn State team stays on track.

@ Rutgers - W 40-7

Rutgers is very bad and I don't think Greg Schiano can compete.

v. Michigan State - L 24-21

The way of the world. Barf.

Tuesday, June 28, 2022

B1G Football Scheduling Proposal

It's no secret that the Big Ten is considering blowing up its football divisions and thank goodness: the East's relative dominance over the West has rendered the divisional format uninteresting. With the possibility of divisions being obliterated, the B1G will need to retool its scheduling. There are really only a trio of key considerations for me:

  1. Protect key rivalries. Duh. This means UM-OSU, UM-MSU, NEB-IOW, MIN-WIS, etc. have to play every year.
  2. Ensure that teams play regularly. Every team should play every other team in the conference at least once every two years. This probably isn't a key issue for the B1G, but it sure is for me!
  3. Nine conference games annually. More conference games is better than fewer conference games.
This leaves me with a few options:
  1. Divisions. Divisions get a lot of hate and rightfully so: the East-West split has yielded a laughable imbalance of power. That said, divisions largely ensure that historical rivalries are protected and that teams play somewhat regularly. We could probably do worse.
  2. Pods. With 14 teams, we'd probably need three pods: one four-team pod and two five-team pods. Obviously mathematically pods work better with 16 teams. But I'll see if this works.
  3. Protected Rivalry(ies). Ensure that a couple of key games happen every year, then rotate.
  4. Free-for-all. Just go nuts.
Before embarking on this endeavor, I assigned my own highly subjective power rankings to each team in the conference and placed that in parentheses as a way of gauging how fair or unfair any proposal may be. Here goes.

I even had a laughable idea: what if we did divisions alphabetically?

Division A
Illinois (13)
Indiana (12)
Iowa (6)
Maryland (11)
Michigan (2)
Michigan State (5)
Minnesota (7)

Division Z
Nebraska (8)
Northwestern (9)
Ohio State (1)
Penn State (3)
Purdue (10)
Rutgers (14)
Wisconsin (4)

The total for Division A is 56 whereas Division Z is 49. Not bad! That is compared to the current East (57) versus West (48) alignment. Of course, the biggest problem with the current format is the fact that #s 1, 2, 3, and 5 are all in the East; this format provides more of a split even if Division Z appears a bit tougher and has the chance to get much tougher if Nebraska ever reemerges, though I've already given them some inflation here.

Still, we can do better.

Pods
This is the hot idea in college football, so how well does it apply to the B1G? I don't know. Here's my thought:

Geographical Pods
Pod A (West)
Nebraska (8)
Iowa (6)
Minnesota (7)
Wisconsin (4)
Illinois (13)

Pod B (East)
Ohio State (1)
Penn State (3)
Maryland (11)
Rutgers (14)

Pod C (Rest)
Michigan (2)
Michigan State (5)
Northwestern (9)
Purdue (10)
Indiana (12)

The balance here is pretty solid: the West and the Rest average team is 7.6th whereas the East average team is 7.25th. The biggest problems: the East is comically at the extremes and I split the Illinois teams.

This split is tremendous news for Michigan State, who loses an annual game with both OSU and PSU in favor of NU/Derp/IU. Even with Sparty's longstanding issues against Northwestern, that looks awfully tasty.

But this thing doesn't even get off the ground. In years where the Rest pod is playing itself and the West pod, Michigan and OSU don't play; that's a non-starter for the B1G. If I move another team to the East pod, I end up with the same problem, just from OSU's vantage point.

Let's try something else:

Power Ranking Pods
Pod A
Ohio State (1)
Rutgers (14)
Iowa (6)
Northwestern (9)
Nebraska (8)

Pod B
Michigan (2)
Illinois (13)
Michigan State (5)
Purdue (10)
Minnesota (7)

Pod C
Penn State (3)
Indiana (12)
Wisconsin (4)
Maryland (11)

I took the teams in the B1G and set this up like a March Madness tourney: best plays worst, next best plays next worst, and so on. I still have rivalry-related issues. I have Ohio State playing exclusively garbage. That's not fun.

Protected Rivalries
I started with a radical concept: what if we give each team three rivals instead of two? Call them "protected games" or "annual opponents" or whatever you want. That was fun but had holes, so I moved to four rivals in order to protect as many rivalry games as possible. Here goes:

Illinois: Northwestern, Purdue, Nebraska, Ohio State
Indiana: Purdue, Michigan State, Rutgers, Maryland
Iowa: Nebraska, Wisconsin, Northwestern, Minnesota
Maryland: Rutgers, Penn State, Purdue, Indiana
Michigan: Ohio State, Michigan State, Minnesota, Northwestern
Michigan State: Michigan, Penn State, Indiana, Purdue
Minnesota: Wisconsin, Michigan, Nebraska, Iowa
Nebraska: Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Wisconsin
Northwestern: Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, Michigan
Ohio State: Michigan, Penn State, Rutgers, Illinois
Penn State: Ohio State, Michigan State, Maryland, Rutgers
Purdue: Indiana, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan State
Rutgers: Maryland, Ohio State, Indiana, Penn State
Wisconsin: Minnesota, Northwestern, Iowa, Nebraska

We may be onto something here. The only "rivalry" game that isn't protected is the Governor's Victory Bell between Minny and Nittany and they play only every other year at this point anyway. Because I want to really run this to ground, let's look at each team individually:

Illinois: Northwestern, Purdue, Nebraska, Ohio State
Incredibly, Illinois has three matchups to protect: the Illini have played all three of Northwestern (Land of Lincoln Trophy), Ohio State (Illibuck), and Purdue (Purdue Cannon) 95+ times. Their games are protected here with Nebraska a nice bonus.

Indiana: Purdue, Michigan State, Rutgers, Maryland
Indiana is easier with whom to deal: Purdue (Old Oaken Bucket) is the only game that really needs protecting, but it's nice to catch Sparty (Old Brass Spittoon) as well. Rutgers and Maryland are an homage to their days in the cellar of the B1G East.

Iowa: Nebraska, Wisconsin, Northwestern, Minnesota
Iowa was the secondary inspiration for the move from three to four protected games due to Nebraska (Heroes Trophy), Wisconsin (Heartland Trophy), and Minnesota (Floyd of Rosedale) all being meaningful rivalries, and Northwestern desperately needing a meaningful protected opponent. This list ends up pretty much like the B1G West has for years, but it helps that Iowa will still have to cycle through OSU/UM/MSU/PSU more regularly.

Maryland: Rutgers, Penn State, Purdue, Indiana
Maryland only needed Penn State. Rutgers makes sense somewhat for timing and geography. Purdue and Indiana are meh. Maryland really lacks meaningful rivals. That's true regardless of scheduling format.

Michigan: Ohio State, Michigan State, Minnesota, Northwestern
The first three rivalries are all big ones with Ohio State (The Game), Michigan State (Paul Bunyan), and Minnesota (the Little Brown Jug). I don't even know what the George Jewett Trophy is, but again, Northwestern needed a big rival.

Michigan State: Michigan, Penn State, Indiana, Purdue
Great, great list for Sparty. Paul Bunyan + Land Grant Trophy + Spittoon. Purdue also exists and geography plays well here.

Minnesota: Wisconsin, Michigan, Nebraska, Iowa
Minny really needed to protect Wisconsin (Paul Bunyan's Axe), Michigan (the Little Brown Jug), Nebraska ($5 Bits of Broken Chair Trophy), and Iowa (Floyd of Rosedale). Minny was the primary spur for the move to four.

Nebraska: Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Wisconsin
Gotta keep building these new western rivalries. Illinois might be weak here, but it helps the Illini to have Nebraska around.

Northwestern: Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, Michigan
A strong list for the Wildcats. Illinois was the only essential game to protect, but keeping Wisconsin makes geographic sense and they've had a number of quality games against Michigan in the last few decades.

Ohio State: Michigan, Penn State, Rutgers, Illinois
Michigan and Penn State make tons of sense. As noted above, Illibuck is a pretty big matchup. Rutgers is here to (i) throw Rutgers a bone, and (ii) get Ohio State near NYC every other year.

Penn State: Ohio State, Michigan State, Maryland, Rutgers
A real bummer not to have Michigan on this list, but these four are no-brainers to me. Ohio State and Michigan State have become rivals over PSU's decades in the B1G whereas Maryland and Rutgers are natural geographic and recruiting rivals. Plus, Maryland and Rutgers both needed big rivals and PSU qualifies.

Purdue: Indiana, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan State
Indiana is the only essential game to protect. Illinois and Sparty both make some sense. Maryland helps Purdue get to four protected games.

Rutgers: Maryland, Ohio State, Indiana, Penn State
Maryland, Ohio State, and Penn State all make sense for reasons stated above. Indiana gets them to four.

Wisconsin: Minnesota, Northwestern, Iowa, Nebraska
Wisky's list is tremendous: Paul Bunyan's Axe, a solid matchup with Northwestern, Heartland Trophy, and Freedom Trophy.

really like this approach. It gets at the heart of what makes college football fun: rivalries, sometimes ridiculous ones. So how would this play out? Let's look at what a Nittany schedule might look like over a few years:

Year 1
@ Ohio State
vs. Michigan State
@ Maryland
vs. Rutgers
@ Illinois
vs. Indiana
@ Iowa
vs. Michigan
@ Minnesota

Year 2
vs. Ohio State
@ Michigan State
vs. Maryland
@ Rutgers
vs. Nebraska
@ Northwestern
vs. Purdue
@ Wisconsin
vs. Illinois

Year 3
@ Ohio State
vs. Michigan State
@ Maryland
vs. Rutgers
@ Indiana
vs. Iowa
@ Michigan
vs. Minnesota
@ Nebraska

Year 4
vs. Ohio State
@ Michigan State
vs. Maryland
@ Rutgers
vs. Northwestern
@ Purdue
vs. Wisconsin
@ Illinois
vs. Indiana

Man, I really like this idea. Teams never go more than three years without playing a home-and-home with every team in the conference and we protect all of the meaningful rivalries in the conference. Yes, we also protect games that we don't necessarily need to protect, but that doesn't seem like a real problem to me. Some fans may complain that protecting, say, Purdue-Maryland, is a bad thing for the conference. My counter? Both squads will still cycle through every other opponent in the conference every two years and, as a bonus. some new rivalries may develop.

Full disclosure: I didn't know how this would go before I started, but I love the way that this ended.