Thursday, June 18, 2015

A Midseason Look at the Chicago Cubs Top 50 Prospects

In the interest of full disclosure, I began drafting this piece immediately after the draft concluded, but I didn't want to post it until we actually knew which 2015 draftees signed with the club, hence the gap between drafting and posting. Nevertheless, I didn't want to wait until mid-July, so I've made some assumptions regarding the draftees and posted anyway.
As I have every time I've posted a prospect ranking, I've altered the format just a bit to provide more relevant information. For example, I've copied the "risk" rating from national publications, with 1 representing Bryce Harper and 5 representing Brady Aiken. Expect a fully detailed listing in October or November. Until then, let this whet your appetite.
As an extremely important note before beginning, neither Arismendy Alcantara nor Javier Baez is eligible for this list. Were they eligible, they'd both push for the top spot.
1. C/LF Kyle Schwarber
Current Level: MLB Chicago (heading to Triple-A Iowa)
MLB ETA: April 2016
Grade: 65
Risk: 3
Tools: 60 hit, 70 power, 75 discipline, 40 glove, 50 arm, 40 run, 60 durability
Analysis: The risk on Schwarber's offensive game is a 1: he's going to hit for power and he's going to draw so many walks with so relatively few strikeouts that the on-base skills will be constant. But the defensive risk is a 5 as he may be a terrible catcher and he may not have the skillset to play an effective left field. If he's defensively homeless, the overall package takes a massive hit. I think he ends up playing a poor - but passable - left field and hits in the middle of the order as part of the 21st century's murderer's row with Rizzo, Bryant, and Soler.
2. SP Duane Underwood
Current Level: High-A Myrtle Beach
MLB ETA: June 2017
Grade: 60
Risk: 4
Tools: 65 FB, 55 CB, 50 CH, 55 command, 60 durability
Analysis: Underwood has cemented himself as the top pitching prospect in the organization through a combination of stuff and performance. Rather strangely, Underwood has really struggled to rack up strikeouts, yet his walk rate has dropped for the fourth straight year and High-A hitters absolutely cannot square up the 20-year-old. As each month passes, Underwood looks more and more like the legitimate starting option that his big arm portends.
3. RF Eloy Jimenez
Current Level: Extended Spring Training (off to Short-Season Eugene soon)
MLB ETA: August 2018
Grade: 60
Risk: 4
Tools: 65 hit, 60 power, 50 discipline, 50 glove, 60 arm, 50 run, 50 durability
Analysis: Eloy had been exclusively about projection until he got stateside this year and posted a huge .323/.363/.548 unofficial batting line in Extended Spring Training. In addition to showing notable power and better-than-expected speed, Jimenez struck out just 16.7% of his plate appearances, suggesting that his approach may be even more advanced than was initially thought. With a smooth swing and plenty of strength, Jimenez could be the rare hit-first right fielder who produces plenty of extra-base power simply by virtue of hitting a boatload of line drives instead of generating loft on the ball.
4. SP Dylan Cease
Current Level: Extended Spring Training (off to Short-Season Eugene soon)
MLB ETA: June 2019
Grade: 60
Risk: 5
Tools: 70 FB, 60 CB, 30 CH, 40 command, 30 durability
Analysis: Cease is the poster child for projection. He underwent Tommy John surgery almost immediately after signing with the Cubs last summer, yet he returned throwing in the upper 90s a few weeks ago. Cease is going to have command issues, both by virtue of his raw but unharnessed arm and due to his recovery from surgery, but the stuff is there to push for a job near the top of a Major League rotation. He's the kind of massive risk that I like to take. Hopefully he'll throw for a couple of months at Eugene to get his delivery heading in the right post-operation direction.
5. SP Carson Sands
Current Level: Extended Spring Training (off to Short-Season Eugene soon)
MLB ETA: April 2018
Grade: 60
Risk: 4
Tools: 50 FB, 40 CB, 60 CH, 50 command, 50 durability
Analysis: Sands has the one thing I look for in a lefty above all else: the diving, tumbling changeup that gives right-handed hitters fits. He struggled with walks in Extended Spring Training, issuing 11 free passes over 14 innings, but he had plenty of strikeouts and limited the hits against him, both encouraging realities for the southpaw. Sands needs repetitions just like any other recent draftee, but he has the look of a pitcher that could move more quickly than the standard prep draftee given the changeup's advanced status. I'm excited to see what Sands can do over the next year.
6. SS Gleyber Torres
Current Level: Low-A South Bend
MLB ETA: May 2018
Grade: 60
Risk: 3
Tools: 65 hit, 45 power, 70 discipline, 60 glove, 55 arm, 55 run, 70 durability
Analysis: Slapping a "3" risk grade on an 18-year-old in Low-A sounds absurd, but Torres has earned such a marker. The shortstop with a clean, quick stroke has proved stunningly adept at managing the strike zone against full-season competition. Although he has struck out nearly 25% of the time, his 10%+ walk rate is an astounding accomplishment, especially when considering that Torres has hit for almost no power thus far. His slight stature may cause some issues down the road, yet as his power emerges, he should be able to maintain high on-base percentages thanks to an excellent hit tool that his him sitting comfortably north of .300 on the year. It remains to be seen if he'll need to shift to the other side of second base, but legitimate middle infield gloves with high-.300 on-base skills have been in high demand forever and for good reason.
7. SP Trevor Clifton
Current Level: Low-A South Bend
MLB ETA: June 2018
Grade: 60
Risk: 5
Tools: 60 FB, 55 CB, 40 CH, 50 command, 60 durability
Analysis: Almost impossibly, Clifton was the only prep pitcher drafted band signed y Jason McLeod in the 2013 draft, the first draft under the current regime. Clifton's mechanics were truly painful to watch coming out of high school, suggesting that a future injury was a foregone conclusion. Thankfully, the minor league staff has smoothed out his delivery in a major way, resulting in a clean delivery from both the windup and the stretch. His fastball hasn't skipped a beat, running up there in the 90s as it did before. The real growth - beyond the mechanical improvement - has come in his 11-5 curveball that he throws with regularity and confidence. I haven't seen enough of his changeup to grade it confidently, but two above-average offerings and clean mechanics is a tremendous jumping-off point for the 6'4" 20-year-old. I really like what I see. Clifton sure looks like $375,000 well spent, even if there's plenty of development between him and big-time prospect status.
8. RP C.J. Edwards
Current Level: Triple-A Iowa
MLB ETA: June 2015
Grade: 60
Risk: 1
Tools: 70 FB, 55 CB, 60 CH, 60 command, 30 durability
Analysis: It may seem strange to see a "1" risk grade in cahoots with a "30" durability rating, but that's Edwards for you. The stuff is undeniably superb with three above-average pitches including two true plus offerings and plenty of command thereof. Unfortunately, Edwards doesn't ever figure to eclipse about 170 pounds, something that will keep him in the bullpen short- and long-term, regardless of what the front office might suggest. No matter: Edwards can close and he'll be a big addition to the roster this summer after he gets a few more weeks at Triple-A under his belt.
9. SP Jake Stinnett
Current Level: Low-A South Bend
MLB ETA: July 2017
Grade: 55
Risk: 5
Tools: 60 FB, 50 CB, 30 CH, 30 command, 70 durability
Analysis: Stinnett is already 23, but he may as well be 19 in terms of his development. That's not a knock on him; it's a reality of his not having turned to pitching full-time until late in college. Stinnett has the benefit of having a low-mileage arm, yet he looks incredibly raw, like a hurler with a desperate need to throw a few hundred more innings before having the chance to really develop a good feel for his stuff. But having seen him throw a few games on video, I like this risk, too. Stinnett is a strong athlete who is going through growing pains.
10. CF Donnie Dewees
Current Level: Draftee
MLB ETA: July 2017
Grade: 50
Risk: 3
Tools: 55 hit, 45 power, 45 discipline, 55 glove, 25 arm, 65 run, 70 durability
Analysis: Dewees is something of a strange pick, a player discussed as a mid-first rounder with absolutely incredible production in college who nonetheless has some holes in his game. Let's start with the bad: Dewees has a Juan Pierre-esque arm, his swing doesn't appear to generate the bat speed that suggests he'll hit for power, and his competition in the Atlantic-Sun Conference was likely subpar. Now for the good: Dewees absolutely destroyed opposing pitchers, hit for excellent power with a compact stroke, should hit for plenty of average, and he runs very well. I could see Dewees flaming out in two years as the level of competition overwhelms him while I could simultaneously see him manning center field at Wrigley in about two year's time if the bat plays up. He's a great pick at #47 overall: lots of upside and enough present production to justify the pick.
11. SP Erling Moreno
Current Level: Extended Spring Training (off to Short-Season Eugene soon)
MLB ETA: July 2019
Grade: 55
Risk: 5
Tools: 60 FB, 35 CB, 60 CH, 60 command, 40 durability
Analysis: Moreno is still just 18 and he enjoyed a strong, albeit brief, Extended Spring Training Run this year. He should get plenty of additional innings to work his way back into form at Eugene. I say that because 2014 Tommy John surgery certainly derailed his development. Fortunately for the Cubs, 6'7" righties with advanced changeups are extremely, so even having gone under the knife, Moreno is a good prospect. He needs lots of time but plenty of pieces are in place.
12. LF Billy McKinney
Current Level: Double-A Tennessee
MLB ETA: July 2016
Grade: 50
Risk: 2
Tools: 70 hit, 40 power, 60 discipline, 45 glove, 45 arm, 45 run, 60 durability
Analysis: McKinney is a polarizing prospect. Some evaluators see a 20-year-old posting a decent line at Double-A, having completely obliterated High-A, with a great hit tool, incredibly contact ability, and strong discipline with enough athleticism to play a number of outfield positions. Others see a left fielder with little power and a subpar defensive profile. Scouts are uniform in their belief that McKinney lacks any kind of useful speed. I fall in the second camp with McKinney, seeing a really nice swing with a good hit tool, but poor power and an underwhelming glove. That profile doesn't play in left, though it might play as a second-division starter in center if McKinney can maintain his career walk rate. Unfortunately for McKinney, pitchers are going to challenge him unless he can show the aptitude to hit for power, something that could curtail his on base rates. He's an interesting prospect thanks to the bat, but his concerns are very concerning.
13. SP Jen-Ho Tseng
Current Level: High-A Myrtle Beach
MLB ETA: June 2017
Grade: 50
Risk: 3
Tools: 55 FB, 55 CB, 55 CH, 60 command, 50 durability
Analysis: I was the high man on Tseng last fall. Unfortunately, the command-dependent righty has pitched only to decent results at Myrtle Beach thus far. Tseng lacks strikeout stuff and although he maintains a strong walk rate in the low 2s, he needs to have his arsenal take a jump or two to project as anything more than a back-end arm. I still love the command profile and think that Tseng will be a useful contributor at the top level. It's just tougher to see an impact arm given his dearth of strikeouts.
14. RP Pierce Johnson
Current Level: Double-A Tennessee
MLB ETA: May 2016
Grade: 50
Risk: 2
Tools: 60 FB, 70 CB, 40 CH, 45 command, 40 durability
Analysis: Another year, another injury for Johnson as a lat strain has cost the righty the first two months of the season. Despite my consistent concerns about his changeup to date, I was willing to stick with Johnson as a starter through the winter, but now, with additional developmental time lost, I think he has to be moved to the bullpen. His stuff should play extremely well there as his curveball is a dominant offering, good enough to retire hitters of both handedness, and his fastball is already a plus offering. His changeup remains subpar and he likely won't feature it much at all out of the bullpen.
15. SP Bryan Hudson
Current Level: Draftee
MLB ETA: 2020
Grade: 55
Risk: 4
Tools: 50 FB, 65 CB, 40 CH, 50 command, 45 durability
Analysis: I very much like the Hudson pick. He's the right type of talent to add to the system in the third round of this June's draft: a tall, lanky prep lefty with a dynamite curveball, enough fastball, and the need to add 20-30 pounds of leg strength to his frame. The Cubs will give him the years needed to do so, and I for one will very much enjoy the journey. I said on draft night that he reminds me of Sean Marshall, delivery and all. That's a fine piece for the system.
16. 2B/LF Ian Happ
Current Level: Draftee
MLB ETA: June 2017
Grade: 50
Risk: 2
Tools: 55 hit, 50 power, 55 discipline, 40 glove, 50 arm, 50 run, 60 durability
Analysis: As I noted in my draft recap, Happ was decidedly on my "Do Not Draft" list at #9 for one simple reason: he's defensively homeless. Happ doesn't look like he'll have the chops to handle an infield job to me, something that torpedoes his value. There's no denying that his bat was extremely impressive at Cincinnati, and I really like his swing from the left side. I don't think he'll run too terribly well, but he should move just fine. His offensive game would play really well at second base...but if his glove pushes him to an outfield corner, he'll have a helluva time being even an average regular at his peak. I listed eight names I would have preferred from the Cubs at #9, but Happ is the guy, so I'll slot him here.
17. 1B Dan Vogelbach
Current Level: Double-A Tennessee
MLB ETA: July 2016
Grade: 50
Risk: 2
Tools: 60 hit, 60 power, 70 discipline, 30 glove, 40 arm, 20 run, 60 durability
Analysis: Somewhat remarkably, Vogelbach has kept himself on the field every day throughout his career, despite arriving with a body that carried a ton of excess fat. Vogelbach has played four full seasons now and the data only somewhat matches the scouting report. Vogelbach has hit for a much better average than might have been expected as his all-fields approach has worked wondrously well. However, his game power just hasn't materialized, almost surely in some part because minor league pitchers refuse to throw him strikes. Nevertheless, Vogelbach will be a negative defensively and on the basepaths regardless of how well the bat develops, so he really needs his power to show up to have anything other than a role 50 future. He's certainly not bad; it's just that he's not a needle-mover when considering the full package.
18. 3B Christian Villanueva
Current Level: Triple-A Iowa
MLB ETA: July 2015
Grade: 45
Risk: 2
Tools: 45 hit, 45 power, 50 discipline, 60 glove, 55 arm, 40 run, 60 durability
Analysis: Kudos to Villanueva for working his way back onto the prospect map. A disastrous 2014 season at the plate had Villanueva fading into obscurity, but a nice recovery both in terms of his on-base ability and particularly with some rediscovered game power in 2015 has him looking like a second-division third baseman thanks to his plus glove and solid arm. Villanueva will never be a star, but he has the defensive chops to be a glove-first regular for a short time and a solid bench option in the longer term, particularly as his game power proves increasingly usable.
19. RP Armando Rivero
Current Level: Triple-A Iowa
MLB ETA: July 2015
Grade: 55
Risk: 3
Tools: 70 FB, 40 CB, 40 CH, 45 command, 50 durability
Analysis: Rivero appeared ready to jump into a late-inning role in Chicago this year, but a terrible start to the season has severely lowered his ceiling. Rivero simply cannot stop walking opposing hitters and he has found strikeouts much tougher to come by. That combination has proved unsurprisingly devastating. Although Rivero has rebounded somewhat from a truly dreadful start, he is still struggling mightily with walks, so he'll likely need more seasoning than expected in order to find the same.
20. C Victor Caratini
Current Level: High-A Myrtle Beach
MLB ETA: April 2018
Grade: 50
Risk: 5
Tools: 55 hit, 45 power, 60 discipline, 50 glove, 55 arm, 30 run, 70 durability
Analysis: Bat flips aside, Caratini still has plenty of Major League caliber tools and as he continues to hold his own against tougher competition, he maintains his status as an interesting prospect. Caratini's game power has continually lagged behind his raw power, yet his game power has even tailed off further as a Cub as the switch-hitter has just one home run during his tenure with the organization. Fortunately, Caratini has continually cut his strikeout rate and his walk rate has taken a big jump this year. He remains raw, but the reports on his defensive work are strong enough to keep this converted infielder on the catching depth chart with the possibility of a breakout remaining reasonable in the future.
21. SP Paul Blackburn
Current Level: High-A Myrtle Beach
MLB ETA: July 2017
Grade: 50
Risk: 4
Tools: 50 FB, 50 CB, 55 CH, 60 command, 60 durability
Analysis: Blackburn's stuff still hasn't taken the leap that the Cubs hoped for when they drafted him, but his pitchability has consistently helped him produce strong results. He has improved his command at each level while continually limiting the long ball. Progress has been methodical, but there may yet be a back-end starting pitcher in here.
22. SP Tyler Skulina
Current Level: High-A Myrtle Beach
MLB ETA: August 2016
Grade: 55
Risk: 5(!)
Tools: 60 FB, 60 SL, 45 CH, 40 CB, 45 command, 70 durability
Analysis: Skulina is massive, and I've often assumed that his frame would cause command problems that would push him to the bullpen. Instead, Skulina has somehow maintained a relatively consistent walk rate as he has climbed through the minors. His big fastball-slider combination stands a good chance to get him to the Majors even if his command falters, albeit in a relief role, but I'm back to thinking that there's a real chance his big stuff gets enough of a command boost to be a viable starting pitching candidate. If the command doesn't improve, he's a role 45 reliever. Not an unreasonable floor.
23. OF Mark Zagunis
Current Level: High-A Myrtle Beach
MLB ETA: April 2017
Grade: 45
Risk: 2
Tools: 55 hit, 40 power, 70 discipline, 50 glove, 45 arm, 55 run, 70 durability
Analysis: Zagunis has shifted completely away from his college role as a part-time catcher/part-time outfielder in favor of a full-time outfield role. While that certainly chops down his value in a big way, he continues to display elite on-base skills, a bit of pop, and solid speed. Zagunis will never be a star, but a plus athlete with elite on-base ability will always have a job, likely as a fourth outfielder or perhaps even in a platoon role, especially if the power continues to grow into game form.
24. RP Corey Black
Current Level: Double-A Tennessee
MLB ETA: July 2015
Grade: 50
Risk: 1
Tools: 60 FB, 45 SL, 55 CH, 45 command, 55 durability
Analysis: I've had Black listed as a reliever for the past few years and the Cubs finally made the switch official recently. It only makes sense as Black's undersized frame simply wouldn't hold up over the course of minor league starts, let alone for full Major League seasons in the rotation. But that's not a knock on Black: in his new role, he should flourish, especially given that he has curbed his previously disastrously climbing walk rate. He's got a chance to pitch in the 7th or 8th inning later this year.
25. CF Jacob Hannemann
Current Level: Double-A Tennessee
MLB ETA: April 2017
Grade: 55
Risk: 5
Tools: 60 hit, 50 power, 60 discipline, 65 glove, 50 arm, 65 run, 70 durability
Analysis: I continue to occupy my spot as the high man on Hannemann, and that's just fine with me. He runs extremely well, if a bit aggressively at times. He's a great athlete as he has maintained plenty of his football physique in a good way. And his plate approach continues to look better than I would have expected given his missed development time in college. His results are still terrible: if the risk scale went from 1-100 instead of 1-5, Hannemann would be at 95+. There's oodles of projection to do here to see a valuable player, but I still see plenty of it.
26. 3B Jeimer Canderlario
Current Level: High-A Myrtle Beach
MLB ETA: July 2017
Grade: 50
Risk: 4
Tools: 50 hit, 50 power, 50 discipline, 45 glove, 60 arm, 35 run, 45 durability
Analysis: After a complete collapse at Daytona in 2014 and a needed return to the Midwest League, Candelario has enjoyed a surprising resurgence this year with a well-rounded game emerging that features average defense and encouraging offense. He's officially back on the map, even if he'll have a tough time reaching his 2013 high given that the body - while vastly improved - still needs more work.
27. SP Justin Steele
Current Level: Extended Spring Training (off to Short-Season Eugene soon)
MLB ETA: July 2019
Grade: 50
Risk: 4
Tools: 50 FB, 45 CB, 35 CH, 40 command, 50 durability
Analysis: Of the three mid-round bonus babies drafted in 2014, Steele is absolutely the least exciting to me. I just don't see the ceiling. He seems like a relatively polished swingman. Perhaps he'll move a bit more quickly than Cease or Sands, but it's tough for me to see Steele ever growing into a solid rotation member. It'll help to get a look at him in short-season ball.
28. 2B Frandy Delarosa
Current Level: Extended Spring Training (off to Short-Season Eugene soon)
MLB ETA: April 2019
Grade: 50
Risk: 5
Tools: 55 hit, 50 power, 45 discipline, 50 glove, 50 arm, 55 run, 50 durability
Analysis: Delarosa struggled through arguably the worst professional debut I've ever seen in 2013, managing just 3 hits in 39 at bats with a stunning 20 strikeouts in the Dominican Summer League. He turned things around in a big way as an 18-year-old back in the DSL last summer and made his way stateside this spring where he played well in Extended Spring Training. His calling cards are diverse with plus athleticism giving him useful speed, a strong defensive profile up the middle, and plenty to believe in with his bat...at least from the left side. I won't be surprised if the Cubs scrap his switch hitting, forcing him to hit lefty full time. His right-handed swing is unimpressive. Still, there's plenty of talent here in the former $700,000 signee. He also happens to physically look an awful lot like Arismendy Alcantara, for whatever that's worth.
29. SP Daury Torrez
Current Level: High-A Myrtle Beach
MLB ETA: July 2017
Grade: 45
Risk: 4
Tools: 50 FB, 50 SL, 40 CH, 50 command, 60 durability
Analysis: Torrez has continued to minimize walks in 2015, but Carolina League hitters have posed a real challenge to him as their collective batting average against him is nearly 100 points higher than was the average of Midwest League hitters. It's not that Torrez has gotten worse: there's just an appreciation now of how important it is for him to locate his sinking fastball. I still see enough here for a fringe starter, but Torrez will need to make a jump to get there.
30. RP Juan Paniagua
Current Level: High-A Myrtle Beach
MLB ETA: July 2017
Grade: 50
Risk: 4
Tools: 60 FB, 50 CB, 50 command, 50 durability
Analysis: I worried that Paniagua could slip into irrelevance without an impressive showing to start 2015, but impress he has. Paniagua has used his huge fastball to throw enough strikes to overwhelm an overmatched league. There are still things to clean up, but two usable pitches can make a useful middle reliever.
31. C Willson Contreras
Current Level: Double-A Tennessee
MLB ETA: April 2017
Grade: 45
Risk: 4
Tools: 50 hit, 50 power, 50 discipline, 50 glove, 55 arm, 45 run, 60 durability
Analysis: Despite receiving a Cub-high $850,000 signing bonus in 2009, Contreras has largely stayed under the radar during his climb up the system. A BABIP-fueled first-half breakout this year has eroded that anonymity. But looking past the BABIP jump, Contreras has maintained a solid walk rate while chopping his strikeouts and adding power. That's the ideal recipe. A converted third baseman, Contreras is plenty athletic. He has a chance to benefit from Kyle Schwarber's promotion in a major way as a full-time gig in the second half should give him the opportunity to confirm that his improvements are legitimate.
32. SP Rob Zastryzny
Current Level: Double-A Tennessee
MLB ETA: April 2017
Grade: 40
Risk: 4
Tools: 50 FB, 45 CB, 55 CH, 50 command, 60 durability
Analysis: Zastryzny is tumbling down this list as he has been hit too hard at each level and a foot injury will cost him at least two months of the 2015 season. Without tons of stuff, Zastryzny needs tremendous command, yet without pitching regularly, his arsenal can't get the needed boost to play up. Here's hoping he recovers in a big way in the second half.
33. RP Dave Berg
Current Level: Extended Spring Training (off to Short-Season Eugene soon)
MLB ETA: July 2016
Grade: 45
Risk: 2
Tools: 55 FB, 40 SL, 70 command, 80 durability
Analysis: It seems a bit absurd, but I've come to appreciate Berg a bit more over the past couple of weeks. While his fastball wouldn't overwhelm coming in at 83 from a traditional delivery, it's actually impressive velocity from a submariner. I still don't like his slider at all, but he doesn't walk anybody and can throw every day. It'll be good for Berg to get into games as he could climb very quickly. There's a chance for something here.
34. SP Jonathan Martinez
Current Level: High-A Myrtle Beach
MLB ETA: July 2017
Grade: 40
Risk: 4
Tools: 50 FB, 50 SL, 60 CH, 60 command, 40 durability
Analysis: I've got a real thing for three kinds of pitchers: (i) guys with huge fastballs, (ii) guys with killer changeups, and (iii) guys who don't walk anybody. Martinez is decidedly not the first guy, but he fulfills the latter two criteria beautifully. It's tough to get a great read on him because the stuff is solid but not special and he's not striking out anybody at the High-A level. Still, as a return for Darwin Barney, Martinez is an absolute coup.
35. CF Albert Almora
Current Level: Double-A Tennessee
MLB ETA: July 2017
Grade: 40
Risk: 5(!)
Tools: 60 hit, 55 power, 20 discipline, 60 glove, 55 arm, 55 run, 40 durability
Analysis: It's basically unthinkable that Almora could be so far down this list given his toolbox, but I put him here without questioning it. I've seen Almora put a number of really impressive swings on balls from professional pitchers, including Major League arms. There's no questioning his swing, his defense, or his athleticism. It's all there. But an inability to lay off pitches can sabotage the entire package, and it's getting to the point where it's tough to see any other outcome with Almora. He still swings at every pitch he can touch with his bat, resulting in piles and piles of weak groundouts. Almora rather consistently looks like Bad Castro, the 2015 version of Starlin Castro who chases every pitch off the plate away. If Almora couldn't improve this facet of his game while watching the approaches of Kyle Schwarber and Dan Vogelbach, I don't have a lot of hope for him. I'm sure that the industry values Almora significantly more highly than I do and he's a Role 60 player if the discipline even reaches a 40 grade. But that's years of improvement away from where he is right now.
36. SP Ivan Pineyro
Current Level: Double-A Tennessee
MLB ETA: April 2016
Grade: 45
Risk: 3
Tools: 50 FB, 40 CB, 60 CH, 50 command, 40 durability
Analysis: After nearly falling off the prospect map entirely as a result of an injury-plagued, ineffective 2014, Pineryo has reestablished himself with authority, cutting his walks, kicking up his strikeouts, and working deeper into games without giving up many homers. I still think that his breaking pitch is of the get-me-over variety, but there's enough here that he should find himself on the 40-man roster this winter with a spot on the Iowa-to-Chicago shuttle permanently reserved for him.
37. RP Starling Peralta
Current Level: Double-A Tennessee
MLB ETA: July 2017
Grade: 45
Risk: 4
Tools: 60 FB, 50 SL, 45 command, 60 durability
Analysis: Peralta is a big guy with a big, mid-90s fastball. Unfortunately, the command is middling and his slider hasn't yet taken the step forward that some predicted. Nevertheless, the Diamondbacks saw enough to take a shot on him in the Rule 5 Draft a couple of years ago, and I think there's enough here for a 7th/8th inning guy, although Peralta does need to take a couple of steps to get there in his mid-20s.
38. RP James Norwood
Current Level: Low-A South Bend
MLB ETA: April 2018
Grade: 40
Risk: 4
Tools: 60 FB, 45 CB, 35 SL, 45 CH, 45 command, 50 durability
Analysis: Norwood has already lost over a month to injury this year, though the type and extent of such injury is not immediately clear. Regardless, I liked his stuff a lot at draft time last year and I'm still plenty bullish on Norwood. But he has had command issues, so he needs to pitch.
39. CF Kevonte Mitchell
Current Level: Extended Spring Training (off to Short-Season Eugene soon)
MLB ETA: July 2019
Grade: 50
Risk: 5
Tools: 55 hit, 60 power, 45 discipline, 50 glove, 60 arm, 60 run, 70 durability
Analysis: Drafted as a third baseman, Mitchell is a great athlete who runs well. Unfortunately, he's a basketball player playing baseball, so he's extremely raw. Fortunately, the athleticism is so good that he's looked pretty good during the transition. The body is there to be a superstar, but there's probably a 1-in-1,000 chance of that actually happening. Still, if he can continue converting bits of his athleticism into useful baseball skills, he'll be a great get. Pitch recognition will be the big concern here.
40. RF Jeffrey Baez
Current Level: Low-A South Bend
MLB ETA: July 2017
Grade: 40
Risk: 4
Tools: 50 hit, 55 power, 45 discipline, 55 glove, 55 arm, 50 run, 70 durability
Analysis: The other Baez still has plenty of skills and looks the part, but the wheels have come off thus far in 2015. Baez is striking out far less, but the has completely stopped hitting for any power in addition to poor on-base ability thus far. It's a bad time for a lost year.
41. CF Darryl "DJ" Wilson
Current Level: Draftee
MLB ETA: April 2020
Grade: 40
Risk: 5
Tools: 50 hit, 30 power, 50 discipline, 50 glove, 45 arm, 60 run, 45 durability
Analysis: As I noted in my draft recap post, Wilson will always be "Not Alonzo Jones" to me. His swing is smooth enough and he appears to be a good, if undersized, athlete. While he runs well, I'm not sure there's enough speed to be a real force on the basepaths. Overall, Wilson is a rather ho-hum prospect to me and he's extremely far from relevance.
42. SP Ryan Kellogg
Current Level: Draftee
MLB ETA: July 2017
Grade: 40
Risk: 4
Tools: 40 FB, 40 SL, 40 CB, 55 CH, 60 command, 60 durability
Analysis: Had Kellogg been eligible for the draft after his freshman season at Arizona State, he may very well have found himself drafted in the first two rounds. Instead, he was a slot bonus draftee in the fifth. There's some possibility that a mechanical adjustment enables his stuff to play up, but it's a longshot.
43. 2B Chesny Young
Current Level: High-A Myrtle Beach
MLB ETA: July 2017
Grade: 40
Risk: 4
Tools: 60 hit, 20 power, 65 discipline, 50 glove, 40 arm, 55 run, 50 durability
Analysis: It's hard not to notice Young. After batting .374 in college, Young carries a composite professional batting average of .336 thus far. On top of his batting average, he has a 9.2% BB% and just a 12.8% K%. Defensively there's not much, but he moves well enough to handle second base...probably. But about that bat: there's no power in it at all. He has yet to homer professionally and he hit just 11 bombs in three years at Mercer. If he keeps hitting in the mid-.300s, he'll find himself a job. He's a name to watch for that reason alone.
44. RP PJ Francescon
Current Level: Double-A Tennessee
MLB ETA: July 2015
Grade: 40
Risk: 2
Tools: 50 FB, 50 SL, 50 command, 65 durability
Analysis: I say the same thing every time I do one of these updates: there's absolutely nothing special about Francescon's stuff. There's no particular reason to think that he's going to make it any higher than he already has. Except, thing is, I love watching him pitch. His fastball is in the low-90s with good tail and his slider works just fine. He's been getting people out in a swingman capacity for years, despite not having tremendous stuff or a third pitch. I'll keep rooting for him.
45. RP Donn Roach
Current Level: Triple-A Iowa
MLB ETA: June 2015
Grade: 40
Risk: 1
Tools: 55 FB, 45 SL, 55 command, 60 durability
Analysis: Roach is never going to strike anybody out. Not ever. But if he avoids walking people like he has so far in 2015, he's plenty useful thanks to extreme groundball tendencies. Roach just throws his sinker all the time and gets opposing hitters to pound it into the zone. He doesn't have a secondary pitch to make him anything more than a long man, but there's value in a cheap long man nonetheless.
46. CF Charcer Burks
Current Level: Low-A South Bend
MLB ETA: April 2019
Grade: 40
Risk: 5
Tools: 45 hit, 30 power, 50 discipline, 55 glove, 40 arm, 65 run, 45 durability
Analysis: The rare ninth-round pick to sign for an overslot bonus, Burks has proven that he can run in a useful way on a baseball diamond. His hitting has a long way to go and he absolutely must stay in center given his arm, but Burks has the ability to grow into something more over the coming years. For now, simply holding his own in full-season ball is enough.
47. C Rafael Lopez
Current Level: Triple-A Iowa
MLB ETA: June 2015
Grade: 40
Risk: 1
Tools: 45 hit, 30 power, 55 discipline, 50 glove, 50 arm, 30 run, 50 durability
Analysis: I debated whether or not Lopez should even go on this list: he reached the Majors last year, and the disappearance of his power really limits his ceiling. But there's something to having an MLB-ready backup catcher at Triple-A, so he gets a mention. There was a time where I could have squinted and seen Lopez as a platoon-type. No longer, as his power has completely vanished.
48. RP Matt Brazis
Current Level: Double-A Tennessee
MLB ETA: June 2016
Grade: 50
Risk: 5
Tools: 60 FB, 50 SL, 45 CB, 60 command, 20 durability
Analysis: Given that the Mariners designated Justin Ruggiano for assignment earlier this month, it's tough to see Brazis as anything other than gravy. Brazis also comes with plenty of stuff as two usable breaking pitches complement a big fastball with good command. But, as always, there's a catch: Brazis simply cannot stay healthy as he missed a big chunk of college with injuries and he's missed almost all of this year as well. Plenty of arm, but he's not healthy enough to use it.
49. RP Ryan McNeil
Current Level: Low-A South Bend
MLB ETA: April 2019
Grade: 50
Risk: 5
Tools: 50 FB, 50 SL, 40 CH, 40 command, 30 durability
Analysis: McNeil injured his elbow in Extended Spring Training in 2013, underwent Tommy John surgery, missed the entire season, and returned for only a dozen or so inning last year in the Northwest League. Needless to say, the former prep third-round-pick desperately needs to pitch. His risk is through the roof - much like Brazis's - but McNeil has the benefit of time on his side as he's still just 21. He does need to pick up the pace as his results have underwhelmed.
50. SP Jeremy Null
Current Level: Low-A South Bend
MLB ETA: July 2018
Grade: 45
Risk: 5
Tools: 50 FB, 50 SL, 45 CH, 60 command, 30 durability
Analysis: Null has pitched his way into mention on this list by posting an absurd walk rate of 0.57 BB/9. That's just crazy. Baseball America had listed Null as the 441st best prospect for the 2014 draft, so it's not as though he came completely out of nowhere. That said, he'll need to prove that his command and body can both hold up despite his massive frame.
A trio of players just missed this list and get their own paragraph. SS Carlos Penalver has never hit, but, by all accounts, he has the chops to handle shortstop well. That kind of glove always hangs around. OF Bijan Rademacher has consistently produced good numbers until hitting a wall at Double-A this year. If he adjusts, he could make himself relevant in a reserve outfielder capacity. And SP Kyle Twomey, a former third round pick, hasn't officially signed as a draftee and he may elect to return to USC for his senior year. However, if he doesn't, there's still plenty of stuff for the former top-100 player in the class of 2012 to make some noise with a much needed developmental step or two. SP Ryan Williams may have earned a mention had I not seen him in person, but he has absolutely no stuff with a slider that would be positively obliterated in the Majors.
The final prospects to get their own mention are a quintet of draftees who appear unlikely to sign. 3B John Cresto has a projectable body with a good-looking bat, but he'll need five years to make it; obviously that's enough time for plenty to go wrong. SP John Kilichowski has enough stuff, but he also can return to Vanderbilt for his junior season, so he's loaded with leverage. SP Jared Padgett is a big lefty with a decent arsenal likely headed for Mississippi State. SP Fitz Stadler is a Chicago-area kid who might be bought out of a college commitment who comes with a huge frame. And my personal favorite, 36th rounder CF Alonzo Jones, is an absolute burner with true 80-grade power and a good enough swing from the left side for 50+ hit and 40+ power if it works out. He's stronger than Billy Hamilton, though obviously he'd need to develop a lot in order for his game speed to be as useful. Any of these five would make this list.
There we have it. The longest snapshot in history.
In closing, just to make sure everyone is drooling, here's a Top Ten Under 25 list:
1. SS Addison Russell
2. 1B Anthony Rizzo
3. 3B Kris Bryant
4. SS Javier Baez
5. SP Kyle Hendricks
6. C/OF Kyle Schwarber
7. RF Jorge Soler
8. SP Duane Underwood
9. 2B/CF Arismendy Alcantara
10. RF Eloy Jimenez

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Analyzing the Chicago Cubs 2015 Draft Class (Rounds 1-10)

NOTE: I cannot, for the life of me, figure out why much of the post below appears in strange, faded type. If I had a better idea how to operate this darn thing, I'd fix it.

With only Day Three of the 2015 MLB Draft left to unfold, lets take a look at the Chicago Cubs' top ten selections.

The Cubs total bonus pool for the 2015 draft for picks in rounds 1-10 and for any bonus amount over $100,000 for a pick in rounds 11-40 is $7,236,100. Given that teams may exceed their pool by 5% before incurring the painful loss of future picks, the effective pool is really $7,597,905. With that in mind, here's a look at the picks. You can click on the player's name for a video.


2B/OF Ian Happ, University of Cincinnati (Junior)
Draft Spot: 1.9 (#9 overall)
Height, Weight: 6'0", 205 lbs.
Bat/Throw: S/R
Date of Birth: 8/12/94 (age 20 years, 10 months)

Slot Bonus: $3,351,000
Projected Bonus: $3,200,000
Bonus Pool Savings/Excess Cost:
$151,000
Scouting Report: 55 hit, 50 power, 55 discipline, 50 arm, 40 glove, 50 run

Pick Analysis: Happ was on my "Do Not Draft" list for a seemingly obvious reason: Happ is defensively homeless. His infield actions are ugly and sloppy, suggesting that second base isn't a truly feasible option for him. Happ is a good - not great - athlete, suggesting that centerfield would be a difficult assignment as well. Unfortunately, that leaves him targeted for left field, a position for which his bat almost certainly cannot prove adequate.

That said, there's a lot to like about Happ's bat. He has suffered an alarming rise in strikeout rate, from just over 12% as a freshman to 19.4% as a junior, but the strikeout rise was accompanied by a big uptick in game power and a consistently superb walk rate that also sat at 19.4% as a junior. Happ's swing from the left side looks very good, portending both average-or-better power and plus hit. With his average-or-better approach, Happ should be a nice contributor against right-handed pitching, especially given his ability to spray the ball all over the field. I don't like his swing from the right side nearly as much as I don't see the power arriving, but his on-base skills should remain. Happ's offensive game would be plus at either second or in center, but his glove threatens to push him to a spot where the offense is underwhelming.

Fortunately for Happ, age is on his side as he won't turn 21 until after he makes his debut in affiliated ball. I think Happ could post .280/.350/.440 batting lines at maturity with his defensive profile dictating just how valuable he is.

I don't like the pick of Happ - I would have preferred LHP Brady Aiken, RHP Jon Harris, CF Daz Cameron (even with his $5M+ demand), LHP Kolby Allard, RHP Mike Nikorak, OF Nick Plummer, and even seriously flawed RHPs Michael Matuella and Cody Ponce - but I'm hoping that I'm dead wrong for the second straight draft. Given that Happ was unlikely to fall past the Reds at #11, he figures to get darn close to full slot money.

CF Donnie Dewees, University of North Florida (Junior)
Draft Spot: 2.5 (#47 overall)
Height, Weight: 5'11", 180 lbs.
Bat/Throw: L/L
Date of Birth: 9/29/93 (age 21 years, 8 months)
Slot Bonus: $1,292,100
Projected Bonus: $1,292,100
Bonus Pool Savings/Excess Cost:
$0
Scouting Report: 55 hit, 45 power, 45 discipline, 25 arm, 55 glove, 65 run

Pick Analysis: Dewees is a very interesting prospect. The videos of him are extremely confusing. His swing is simultaneously underwhelming - he doesn't generate great bat speed - and pretty impressive - he has his barrel in the zone for an extended period in basically every video I saw, even when he pops out. He somehow barreled 18 homers this year, though I'm not sure how. He doesn't figure to hit for even average power at maturity.

On the other hand, Dewees is really darn fast, something that should enable his glove to play up above average in centerfield. He should also have the opportunity to swipe 20+ bags at maturity, assuming his bat justifies an everyday role.

There's plenty to like with Dewees, though he drew stunningly few walks for a player with such good power against seemingly inferior competition in the Atlantic-Sun Conference. He should have a very high floor as his speed and glove should have him in consideration for a reserve outfielder job relatively quickly. But there's a good bit of projection left with him as well as an uptick in any of his offensive tools - hit, power, or discipline - could push him toward being a true plus prospect.

Dewees was in consideration in the middle of the first round, so he figures to get at least his slot value, if not a bit more. I like getting Dewees at #47 a lot. He could get to .290/.335/.430 at maturity with the chance to swipe 20 bags and average defense in center with his noodle arm the only thing holding him back out there. He reminds me a lot of Sam Fuld. You can do worse.

LHP Bryan Hudson, High School (Illinois)
Draft Spot: 3.7 (#82 overall)
Height, Weight: 6/8", 220 lbs.
Bat/Throw: L/L
Date of Birth: 5/8/97 (age 18 years, 1 month)

Slot Bonus: $731,000
Projected Bonus: $900,000
Bonus Pool Savings/Excess Cost: -$169,000
Scouting Report: 50 FB, 65 CB, 40 CH, 50 Command

Pick Analysis: There's just a ton to like about Hudson and this pick. His fastball isn't quite an average pitch just yet, sitting regularly in the high-80s without much movement, but he should be able to kick it up to the 90-91 range with a bit of growth and strength. His changeup is underwhelming at present and he'll need to find the pitch to stick as a starting pitcher given the ability of teams to load up on right-handed hitters.

But the curveball. My goodness, the curveball. Hudson could probably use the 75-78 offering right now in games. It figures to be a monster delivery.

I don't have concerns with his mechanics, but it's clear that he needs to put on about 20 pounds of muscle if he's going to have a chance to keep himself healthy and effective. His delivery is smooth but there doesn't appear to be much push coming from his lower half. Thankfully, Hudson just turned 18 last month, so there's plenty of time for growth here. He's a strong pick in this spot with a shot to be a mid-rotation starter based on the physique and present curveball with plenty of projectability elsewhere. He just needs to work out and pitch for a few years.

CF Darryl ("DJ") Wilson, High School (Ohio)
Draft Spot: 4.8 (#113 overall)
Height, Weight: 5/8", 177 lbs.
Bat/Throw: L/L
Date of Birth: 10/8/96 (age 18 years, 7 months)
Slot Bonus: $503,100
Projected Bonus: $900,000
Bonus Pool Savings/Excess Cost:
-$396,900
Scouting Report: 50 hit, 30 power, 50 discipline, 45 arm, 50 glove, 60 run
Pick Analysis: There's plenty to like about Wilson. First, as a Vanderbilt commit, I feel comfortable stating that the kid can play baseball. Vanderbilt doesn't recruit subpar ballplayers. Second, despite his small stature and his run-first profile, Wilson has enough arm to actually handle an everyday job in center. Third, while power never figures to be a part of his repertoire, Wilson should hit enough to get himself on base at a decent clip. It's basically impossible to see him growing into a first-division role, but he could make his way onto a roster at some point.


But to me, Wilson is always going to be "not Alonzo Jones." Jones, a fellow Vanderbilt commit likely headed to centerfield, remains undrafted through 10 rounds, indicating that his bonus demands were such that he priced himself out of this draft. However, I think that Jones should hit for 40+ power with a 50+ hit tool - especially as a lefty - and true, 80-grade speed. Jones ran a 6.17 60-yard dash; for reference's sake, Wilson and his 60-grade speed came in at 6.68 seconds. I would have loved adding Jones to the franchise. Wilson? Wilson is good enough, I guess. This is a solid pick. It's just not the way I hoped the early part of Day Two would unfold, with Jones in the third round and a projectable arm in the fourth.

LHP Ryan Kellogg, Arizona State University (Junior)
Draft Spot: 5.8 (#143 overall)
Height, Weight: 6/6", 230 lbs.
Bat/Throw: R/L
Date of Birth: 2/4/94 (age 21 years, 3 months)

Slot Bonus: $376,700
Projected Bonus: $400,000
Bonus Pool Savings/Excess Cost:
-$23,300
Scouting Report: 40 FB, 40 CB, 40 SL, 55 CH, 50 Command
Pick Analysis: By all accounts, Kellogg would have been drafted much higher had he been able to enter the draft two years ago. After an extremely exceptional freshman year at Arizona State for the Canadian, Kellogg didn't show much in the way of improvement over the subsequent two years. While his strikeout rate finally ticked up this year, his homer rate climbed over each of his last two seasons and his H/9 never replicated his freshman season.

On the plus side, Kellogg never once issued even 2.0 BB/9 over his three seasons. Importantly for a lefty with dreams of starting, his changeup is his best pitch.

Unfortunately, there's not much ceiling in the overall package. Kellogg has some inefficiency in his delivery with his front foot coming down too soon, something that likely saps some of his velocity and keeps him in the high-80s. His curveball doesn't have much bite despite sitting in the 70s.

It's tough to see Kellogg ever turning into anything more than a swingman, but there's a non-zero chance that smoothing out his mechanics helps his velocity tick up a bit, something that could help Kellogg kick up a grade as he so desperately needs to do.

RHP Dave Berg, UCLA (Senior)
Draft Spot: 6.8 (#173 overall)
Height, Weight: 6'0", 190 lbs.
Bat/Throw: R/R
Date of Birth: 3/28/93 (age 22 years, 2 months)

Slot Bonus: $281,900
Projected Bonus: $100,000
Bonus Pool Savings/Excess Cost:
$181,900
Scouting Report: 40 FB, 40 SL, 70 Command
Pick Analysis: Berg is the first truly difficult pick to peg in the entire bunch. On one hand, the submariner works with an 83 mph sinking fastball and a 78 mph frisbee slider. The stuff isn't wowing anybody.


On the other hand, it's impossible to argue with Berg's results: he issued just 8 walks over 66.2 innings this year and he allowed just 5 home runs in 267 collegiate innings in his time as a Bruin. He strikeout totals were never terribly gaudy, but then again, he struck out nearly a batter per inning as a senior. I've obviously heard the Chad Bradford comps. Berg actually has quite a bit more velocity than Bradford and he has the command to make it play.

Berg could be a really nice, contact-oriented reliever for a number of years. I'm completely dumbfounded regarding his bonus: he may get slot, yet there's a chance that I'm even a bit high at $100,000. Regardless, he should move very quickly as an accomplished big-time collegiate closer.

RHP Craig Brooks, Catawba College (Senior)
Draft Spot: 7.8 (#203 overall)
Height, Weight: 5'10", 180 lbs.
Bat/Throw: R/R
Date of Birth: 9/23/92 (age 22 years, 8 months)
Slot Bonus: $211,300
Projected Bonus: $20,000
Bonus Pool Savings/Excess Cost:
$191,300
Scouting Report: Brooks throws a low-90s fastball, a curveball, and a cutter
Pick Analysis: Brooks is the first pick that figures to be have made exclusively with saving money against the bonus pool in mind. That said, he's plenty interesting. I can't find any video, so I won't pretend to post a full scouting report. But from information gleaned from a couple of spots, it's clear that he works with a trio of pitches and that he has strikeout ability given his absurd 14.36 K/9 this year. As a starting pitcher. It's nearly impossible to wrap my head around that, even if he was pitching in Division II.


Brooks was tremendously successful in college, so he's a worthwhile gamble for what figures to be a minimal bonus.

RHP Preston Morrison, TCU (Senior)
Draft Spot: 8.8 (#233 overall)
Height, Weight: 6'2", 185 lbs.
Bat/Throw: R/R
Date of Birth: 7/19/93 (age 21 years, 11 months)

Slot Bonus: $174,200
Projected Bonus: $10,000
Bonus Pool Savings/Excess Cost:
$164,200
Scouting Report: 40 FB, 40 SL, 45 CH, 60 Command
Pick Analysis: Morrison was the Big 12 Pitcher of the Year in 2014, but he achieved the honor in spite of middling stuff. His delivery is nearly sidearm with whippy action that results in plenty of tail on his fastball and middling movement on his slider. As for the stuff itself, he features a mid-80s fastball and a low-70s slider, neither of which figure to even reach even average grades. Thankfully, Morrison added a possibly useful changeup in college. As has been the norm thus far, Morrison rarely issues a free pass.


He's probably nothing more than a middle reliever if everything comes together, but again, the club could do worse on a bonus pool saver.

Tyler Peitzmeier, Cal State - Fullerton (Senior)
Draft Spot: 9.8 (#263 overall)
Height, Weight: 6'2", 210 lbs.
Bat/Throw: L/L
Date of Birth: 02/26/93 (age 22 years, 3 months)

Slot Bonus: $162,800
Projected Bonus: $10,000
Bonus Pool Savings/Excess Cost:
$152,800
Scouting Report: 50 FB, 40 SL, 50 Command
Pick Analysis: As can be expected from a senior arm at this point in the draft, Peitzmeier lacks impressive stuff. That said, there's something interesting about him. His fastball is relatively straight and his slider lacks useful bite, but he does a strange toe drag and a left arm wrap as part of his delivery, something that can mess with the batter's eye plane during the pitch. Peitzmeier has struggled with walks far more than the pitchers listed above, though he did allow his first collegiate home run in 2015, his only homer surrendered over 124 innings. There's definitely some deception that works for the young southpaw, even if the total package is likely that of an organizational arm.


SS Vimael Machin, VCU (Senior)
Draft Spot: 10.8 (#293 overall)
Height, Weight: 5'11", 185 lbs.
Bat/Throw: L/R
Date of Birth: 9/25/93 (age 21 years, 8 months)

Slot Bonus: $152,000
Projected Bonus: $5,000
Bonus Pool Savings/Excess Cost:
$147,000
Scouting Report: 40 hit, 35 power, 50 discipline, 30 run, 40 glove, 40 arm
Pick Analysis: Manchin was exclusively added for his bonus demand or lack thereof. He doesn't have the skills to stick around as his bat speed is far too slow while he's not nearly athletic enough to hang on the left side of the infield.

My estimated bonuses yielded $6,837,100 in bonuses for picks from Rounds 1-10 compared to a pool of $7,236,100. Such bonuses would leave the club with $399,000 of wiggle room to allocate to the over-$100,000 bonus portion for any picks in Rounds 11-40. While the ability to give one of those draftees $500,000 to entice him to sign is attractive, it feels difficult to justify the extent to which the Cubs punted the latter half of the top ten rounds.

Overall, I'm underwhelmed by the class thus far. Happ was far from my favorite, and while there's plenty of projectability for Dewees, Hudson, and Wilson, it's not the most enthusiasm-inducing group given the lack of power, both at the dish and on the mound. Perhaps some Day Three surprises will spin things around.


In an earlier piece over at Bleed Cubbie Blue, I had suggested that this could be the year where the Cubs exploit the hole in the CBA by spending wildly in excess of their draft bonus pool. It certainly doesn't appear as though the club will do that, but with perhaps as much as $500,000 to throw around on Day Three, the class could remain interesting.

Tuesday, June 9, 2015

An Extremely Quick Look at Cubs Targets at #82 Overall

I'll have a complete recap of draft thoughts after the whole shindig gets wrapped up later this week, but for now, I wanted to get something down about my top targets for the Cubs at #82 overall, the seventh selection in the third round today.

There are six targets of particular interest to me, so without wasting any time, here are the players:

1. RHP Michael Matuella (Duke)
Analysis: Matuella was a top-five talent at the beginning of 2015, but he followed some back and shoulder injuries with Tommy John surgery this spring, causing him to tumble down draft boards and, most likely, off of some boards entirely. That said, there aren't a lot of 6'6" starters with huge stuff available at this stage. Maybe Matuella has a <10% of working out, but the reward is massive. I'd have taken the plunge earlier; I'd definitely take it now.

2. RHP Cole Sands (High School (Florida))
Analysis: The younger brother of Cubs 2014 fourth-round-pick Carson Sands, Cole is actually much younger: whereas Carson was drafted two and a half months after his 19th birthday, Cole is still 17 on draft day. Cole already features a strong, tailing low-90s fastball and, as something of a rarity for a prep righty, a useful changeup. His slider doesn't have a ton of bite, but the other two offerings make him plenty attractive. His mechanics need to be smoothed out to improve his command profile as his follow-through takes him nearly off the mound toward first base, but mechanical improvement should help his slider pick up a little extra bend as well.

3. RHP Jacob Nix (Prep School (Florida))
Analysis: Nix famously got caught up in the Brady Aiken mess with the Astros last year, eventually settling with Houston for an amount far less than his agreed-upon bonus with the club. After a year at IMG Academy in Bradenton, Nix reentered the draft and he figures to be a very early pick on Day Two. The 6'4", 205 lbs. righty comes with a clean delivery featuring a high leg kick that enables him to pump out a huge, mid-90s fastball with regularity. Nix's slurvy breaking ball isn't terribly enticing and his changeup needs plenty of work as well, but Nix has the body and the raw stuff to be a legitimate starting pitcher in the Majors. It's tough to find those at this stage in the draft.

4. SS/CF Alonzo Jones (High School (Georgia))
Analysis: Jones would be a tremendous pickup at this stage in the draft. The switch-hitter is currently listed as a shortstop, but I'd want him as a centerfield prospect. Jones gets a true 80 grade for his speed from multiple sources, posting a sizzling 6.17 second 60-yard dash. His arm isn't enough for shortstop and his infield actions are underwhelming, but again, the speed should play extremely well in center. Offensively, Jones doesn't have the prettiest swing around with tons of pre-pitch hitches, particularly from the left side. I don't think he'll hit for any power from the right side - maybe 30 grade - and given his speed he may be asked to scrap switch-hitting entirely, but there's a chance for 40-45 power from the left side. That kind of player can be really useful. Unfortunately, Jones is committed to Vanderbilt and it is unlikely that he'll be willing to sign for third round money. Hopefully I'm wrong on that front.

5. RHP Riley Ferrell (TCU)
Analysis: Ferrell is a simple pick. He has a huge, upper-90s fastball and a wipeout slider. But that's it. And he appears to have no shot to start. No matter. Ferrell is a better prospect than Tony Zych, the last Cubs draftee to fit this profile. I'd be happy trying that again.

6. SS Jalen Miller (High School (Georgia))
Analysis: Whereas Jones above is a current shortstop who projects elsewhere, Miller has the defensive chops to stay at short even if he may end up at second base in the future. He's athletic enough to play capably anywhere on the diamond. His swing and frame don't figure to lead to big power, but there's enough power for an everyday role, particularly given that Miller's compact stroke should help his average hit tool adjust to professional pitching. I don't love Miller like I love the first four names on this list, but he'd be a viable pick with some upside.

*Note: LHP Justin Hooper (High School (California)) and RHP Donny Everett (High School (Tennessee)) would have made this list if I thought that the Cubs had any chance to sign either of them. I don't, so they'll have to enjoy a few years at UCLA and Vanderbilt, respectively, first.

Saturday, June 6, 2015

A Much More Timely Look at the Cubs Options in the 2015 MLB Draft

Back in late February, I took a ridiculously early look at the Cubs' options at #9 overall in the 2015 Rule 4 Draft. Since then, unsurprisingly, some things have changed.

I'd like to make a final preference list for the Cubs at #9. To add some intrigue, I'll start by looking at the six players I specifically omitted from my February list, address those who were in my top 15 in February but have since slipped out, toss out some comments on other top-20 prospects who don't make my list, and then, finally, rank my top 16 options for the Cubs at #9.

The "Please No" Six
My February post linked above included six players who, for one reason or another, I didn't want the Cubs to draft. How does that list hold up now? Let's see.

Player: RHP Walker Buehler (Vanderbilt)
What I Said Then: Buehler is C.J. Edwards 2.0: big stuff, 160 lbs. body. Unfortunately for Buehler, size cannot be taught.
What I Say Now: This piece from Kiley McDaniel did a great job of portraying that the industry-wide bias against short right-handed pitchers with elite stuff is largely bogus. Unfortunately, Buehler's problem isn't really his height (he's probably 6'1"); it's still the weight as 160 pounds just doesn't ever cut it for a starter. I'm more open to Buehler now than I was in February, but I'll still be disappointed if he is the pick.

Player: LHP Nathan Kirby (Virginia)
What I Said Then: Kirby has a three-pitch mix as a college lefty. He should be in my wheelhouse. But I don't see the ceiling. I think he's Travis Wood if it all works out and that's not top-ten worthy.
What I Say Now: Kirby is way down the board for me now. With a lat injury and command woes, I'll pass.

Player: SS Dansby Swanson (Vanderbilt)
What I Said Then: He's just never going to hit enough. He's in the Deven Merrero mold of collegiate shortstops who have the glove but not nearly enough bat.
What I Say Now: Well now, this gets a little more interesting. Swanson is in the conversation for one of the top two picks and he's seen as a lock to go in the top five at this point on the heels of a college season where he just kept on hitting. I still don't see the power and I like bats more than gloves. I can still find a dozen players I'd rather have than Swanson. But I'm in a tiny minority at this point. The glove is excellent and he's a real shortstop, not just a guy with a chance to stick there. That's a real plus. And credit where credit is due: Swanson has 14 homers on the year. He's hit for tons of power in college.

Player: RHP Ashe Russell (High School (Indiana))
What I Said Then: Whippy mechanics. It's a high-stress delivery; he's going to get hurt, even if the stuff is enticing.
What I Say Now: Russell's ceiling isn't extreme enough to justify the risk, though the possibility of the Cubs rolling three Russells deep with Ashe, Addison, and the immortal James would be fun.

Player: 2B/SS Ian Happ (Cincinnati)
What I Said Then: Not nearly athletic enough for an athlete-first profile. He might hit .300 someday, but he's never going to hit for power and it's tough to see an even average up-the-middle glove profile.
What I Say Now: Happ is the poster child for the Epstein/Hoyer/McLeod regime when it comes to the amateur draft. He's a good athlete with tons of production in college. So why don't I like him? He doesn't look fast enough to me and I think he's going to end up in an outfield corner. If he's a LF, he's not going to be much of an asset without big power, something Happ just doesn't have. I'll be very disappointed if Happ is the pick, though I'm preparing for the possibility.

Player: SS Alex Bregman (LSU)
What I Said Then: I should like him a lot. His swing is really simple, something that should help him make contact as a professional. I just have such a difficult time buying that (1) he's really going to hit for power, and (2) that he's actually a shortstop.
What I Say Now: I like Bregman more now than I did in February, though he's still not among the elite to me. I think he'll be a real defensive asset at second base and he'll get on base enough to be a productive big leaguer even with only 10-homer power. Fine player, but nothing special.

Players from the February Top 15 Who Lost Their Spots
This section needs no further introduction beyond the title, so let's get right to it:

Player: RHP Riley Ferrell (TCU)
February Rank: 15th
Why He's Out: Ferrell has a couple of problems. He doesn't even throw a third pitch, much less an effective one. But the much larger problem with Ferrell is that he has walked 18 batters in just 28.1 innings thus far in 2015. Even with an absurdly high strikeout rate, that kind of problem for a college closer is a killer for me. He might be available in the second round, where I'd be plenty happy to take a shot on his big arm.

Player: RHP Kyle Funkhouser (Louisville)
February Rank: 9th
Why He's Out: As higher ceilings have emerged, Funkhouser's relatively low ceiling in my mind has kicked him down the board. To make matters worse, Funkhouser's velocity has evaporated and his agent advisor is withholding his medical information from teams. That doesn't sound good.

Player: LHP Justin Hooper (High School (California))
February Rank: 6th
Why He's Out: I still like Hooper plenty, probably more than most. He's a boom or bust prospect with the "bust" outcome looking much more likely. But he's probably still in the top 20 on my list. The arm is so huge.

Other Top Prospects Not on My List
Again, a self-explanatory grouping, so away we go...

Player: CF Garrett Whitley (High School (New York))
Kiley McDaniel's Rank: 15th
Why He's Out: Whitley looks like a good athlete with the skills to be a star. But he's incredibly raw right now. Being so raw, it's difficult to put too terribly much stock in the athleticism given that he's already given away thousands of plate appearances to his more southerly compadres. He may have the highest ceiling of any position player in this class, but he probably has a less than 1% chance of reaching it. In the second round? Sign me up. But not in the top ten.

Player: LF Trenton Clark (High School (Texas))
Kiley McDaniel's Rank: 14th
Why He's Out: Clark's ideal future is as the left-handed version of Hunter Pence. He has a strange grip on the bat and a bizarre swing plane that has nonetheless produced strong results. He does appear to run reasonably well, so I could see myself being interested in Clark if someone can convince me that he could plausibly be a top-of-the-order bat with 12-15 homer pop. Still, he'd be on the top list if he profiled in center.

Player: C Tyler Stephenson (High School (Georgia))
Kiley McDaniel's Rank: 12th
Why He's Out: How to put this diplomatically? Stephenson is not a great athlete. Stephenson is a poor athlete who already looks like a catcher. He's going to be a negative runner. I actually like his swing plenty and he uses all fields well, especially for a prepster. But there's just so little athleticism that unless he's the perfect receiver/framer/thrower, he's not bringing much to the table. Too low a floor for me.

Player: 3B Cornelius Randolph (High School (Georgia))
Kiley McDaniel's Rank: 10th
Why He's Out: Randolph has good hands and it looks like he should be able to hit reasonably well. I don't like the amount of herky-jerky movement he has, but big lefties with good hands have a future. Unfortunately, I don't see the athleticism for anything other than a corner outfield profile defensively. You need a massive bat to fill that role, not a good one.

Player: OF Andrew Benintendi (Arkansas)
Kiley McDaniel's Rank: 8th
Why He's Out: Benintendi is another guy that I think I'm supposed to love who I just don't believe in. He looks plenty athletic, but it seems to me that his ascent from a second-round fourth outfielder prospect to possible top-ten pick was much too quick. I don't see much power in the swing, yet his 18 homers this year directly contracts that. He also drew 42 walks while striking out just 30 times. The numbers are marvelous and he should be able to play a solid center field. He's probably 16th on my list. I just don't buy the swing enough.

Player: OF Kyle Tucker (High School (Florida))
Kiley McDaniel's Rank: 4th
Why He's Out: Everyone loves the swing because he looks so smooth and simple with a lefty stroke, but I just don't like it. There must be some kind of stupid bias in play for me here. I've even watched his home runs and his deep doubles, but I don't like Tucker's approach at the plate. I don't see him responding well to having to change his swing patch when he faces advanced pitching. If you're drafting a guy because his current swing is pretty more so than because of his premium athleticism, you want that swing to translate. I don't think Tucker's will and that increases the risk exponentially.

The Final Top 16
Yet another section that needs no further introduction. Let's get right to it.

16. RHP James Kaprielian
Height/Weight: 6'4"/200 lbs.
Date of Birth: 3/2/94 (21)
School: UCLA
What I Like: The curveball. It's only a high-80s offering, but he showed both a 12-6 hammer and a slurvier breaker that gave hitters problems. One killer pitch is nice. The righty has a nice mix with a 90 mph fastball, a low-80s slider, and a seldom-used mid-80s changeup. The fastball velocity jumped a bit this spring as I had hoped, pushing Kaprielian up this list a bit.
What I Don't Like: Such a herky-jerky delivery. It's hard to believe that Kaprielian will ever have a truly smooth delivery, something that seriously threatens his command profile. He arches back in his windup, something that may result in command woes. But that's not even the biggest concern. The biggest concern is the fastball. Kaprielian is big enough that you'd expect more velocity than 90-91. If he's only sitting in that range, he probably drops down this list a good bit. Since he jumped up into 92-93 territory, he got a boost. But there's still concern about the legitimacy of the velocity.
Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: 95%


15. RHP Beau Burrows
Height/Weight: 6'1"/200 lbs.
Date of Birth: Unknown
School: High School (Texas)
What I Like: His fastball/curveball combination is excellent. The fastball sits 93-94, though it is relatively straight. The curveball is the more impressive offering, a 12-6 hammer at 78-80 that he threw confidently to both righties and lefties. He occasionally threw a third pitch that I couldn't quite decipher, sitting between 83 and 86 with some downward movement. I'd believe that it was a two-seam fastball, a splitter, or a changeup. Regardless, the pitch moved well.
What I Don't Like: If I had more confidence in Burrows' frame, he'd rank higher on this list as well. He's big enough to pitch, but I'm not sure that he's big enough to stick as a starter. Fueling this concern is that Burrows generates a lot of his velocity from a rock-back in the same manner as Kaprielian. As a result, with a runner on first, Burrows loses a few tickes on his fastball. There's plenty to work with here, though the package is still pretty raw.
Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: 95%


14. RHP Phil Bickford
Height/Weight: 6'4"/200 lbs.
Date of Birth: 7/10/95 (19)
School: Southern Nevada Junior College
What I Like: Bickford's fastball sits in a good spot, comfortably at 93 and routinely at 95. The pitch doesn't move much, but that's the right kind of velocity. I like his 79-81 slurve: the pitch has tight rotation and solid deceptiveness.
What I Don't Like: I'm not sure if Bickford even throws a changeup. I don't think that passing on the Blue Jays to attend Cal-State Fullerton and now SNJC will hurt him all that much, though it's possible that his development will be at least somewhat stunted as a result. Bickford isn't my favorite, but the red flags are relatively minor...except for that mysteriously failed physical with Toronto.
Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: 95%


13. C Chris Betts
Height/Weight: 6'2"/220 lbs.
Date of Birth: 3/10/97 (18)
School: High School (California)
What I Like: In order to really like Betts, you have to believe that he's a catcher. Fortunately, while that is often difficult with premium bats that have played catcher up the pipeline - as was the case with Kyle Schwarber and Alex Jackson at the top of the 2014 first round - Betts is a true catcher with a huge arm. It remains to be seen how well he develops the non-throwing portion of his game, but framing, receiving, and game-calling all require experience. Betts has an offensive game that figures to be plenty adequate with a compact stroke that should yield double-digit home runs and at least an average hit tool. He has a strong, all-around profile. He's a baseball mutt by all accounts, something that doesn't hurt.
What I Don't Like: If Betts can't stick at catcher, he's a first baseman. If he's a first baseman, he's much less exciting given the 5+ projection of his power and hit tools. The defensive projection is essential and I just don't have enough information to slap a surefire plus defensive catcher tag on him.

Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: 99%

12. RHP Dillon Tate
Height/Weight: 6'2"/185 lbs.
Date of Birth: 5/11/94 (21)
School: UC Santa Barbara
What I Like: A huge sinking fastball and a similarly huge devastating slider. Yum. His body should be able to hold a full workload despite having never pitched more than 100 innings before.
What I Don't Like: The changeup isn't close and the curveball is a throwaway offering. He needs a third pitch to make it. The floor should be that of a high-leverage reliever. I don't like how much Tate reaches back in his delivery as I worry about the impact on his command.

Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: 25%

11. LHP Tyler Jay
Height/Weight: 6'1"/175 lbs.
Date of Birth: 4/19/94 (21)
School: Illinois
What I Like: A strong fastball, an excellent curveball, and a useful slider. I have absolutely no doubt that Jay could be an excellent closer in about two years. The fastball-curveball combination is that strong. I like the mechanics plenty.
What I Don't Like: If you're a lefty, there's one pitch you absolutely have to have to survive in the rotation and that's the changeup. Unfortunately, the changeup is Jay's weakest offering. That's a devastating development for me.

Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: 25%

10. RHP Cody Ponce
Height/Weight: 6'5"/235 lbs.
Date of Birth: 4/25/94 (21)
School: Cal Poly Pomona
What I Like: Big body, big stuff, great delivery. His consistently mid-90s tailing fastball is going to keep him employed for a while, and his slider is a big mover in the mid-to-high-80s, similar to Jake Arrieta's slider/cutter. He toys around with a high-70s curveball that's primarily a get-me-over pitch but can show some devastating break, and I really like what I saw from his low-80s power curveball as he threw it all over the place to lefties. Perhaps
this sequence provides the best indication of what Ponce can be. Ponce also enjoyed a tremendous summer in the Cape Cod League, suggesting that his stuff plays well even against elite competition.
What I Don't Like: I just don't like that he's at Cal Poly Pomona. It makes no sense. There may be some lingering ill-will toward Division II prospects from the Hayden Simpson experience - be that fair or not. Ponce apparently worked in the mid-80s coming out of high school, so that likely played a big role in his college choice. Ponce is the kind of guy where the advanced scouts make their money. If he's just a late-blooming monster, gobble him up. If there's some terrifying red flag, stay away. (I'm going with the late-blooming monster option.) His shoulder injury this spring combined with disappointing stuff this year suggests that it may be the former, unfortunately.
Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: 99%


9. RHP Michael Matuella
Height/Weight: 6'7"/220 lbs.
Date of Birth: 6/3/94 (21)
School: Duke
What I Like: Matuella is a monster, yet despite his huge frame, he commands his pitches well. That's a rare skill from such a big-bodied hurler.  Those pitches? Mid-90s heater, mid-80s changeup, high-70s curveball, and mid-80s slider. Boom. That's it. The fastball has the kind of tail and dive that everyone loves.
What I Don't Like: Given the above description, Matuella would figure to be right there at the top of this list Unfortunately, there's a dreaded drawback: injury. A back injury cost Matuella a month in 2014, exacerbating fears over the durability of his large body and then the butcher arrived with devastating news this spring as Matuella underwent Tommy John surgery. I'd still be ecstatic if the Cubs nabbed him. The arm is that good.
Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: 99%


8. OF Nick Plummer
Height/Weight: 5'11"/190 lbs.
Date of Birth: Unknown
School: High School (Michigan)
What I Like: Michigan! I like that he's from Michigan. OK, beyond just his hometown, I love that Plummer generates big lefty power with a simple, smooth stroke. His swing and finish remind me a lot of Chase Utley's. He's got a bat that should hit for good average and great power. It's tougher for me to know about his discipline and approach, though guys who spend time on the summer and prospect circuits tend to be at least passable here.
What I Don't Like: The defensive profile. It's tough to get a good read on Plummer's athleticism in videos showcasing his swing, but given the body type and his stride, it seems like he's most likely a corner outfielder. That puts a ton of pressure on the bat to play up. Perhaps there's enough athleticism there for him to spend some time in centerfield, but if his defensive profile is as uninspiring as it seems like it might be - Billy McKinney, anyone? - Plummer will have a tough time being an impact player. I also don't like that I can't find more information about his defensive profile.
Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: 75%


7. RHP Mike Nikorak
Height/Weight: 6'5"/205 lbs.
Date of Birth: 9/16/96 (18)
School: High School (Pennsylvania)
What I Like: Nikorak has a quality fastball. He works comfortably in the low-90s with the ability to pump out plenty of offerings in the 93-94 territory while sometimes slipping to 89. Still, the fastball moves well and has enough command right now to grade out as a plus pitch. I wasn't much of a fan of his curveball, a mid-70s slurvy breaker. However, his high-70s changeup fell off of the table in extremely encouraging fashion. I'd much rather have a high schooler with a strong changeup as that offering tends to be more difficult to learn. His delivery is plenty smooth.
What I Don't Like: The breaking ball just didn't do it for me. I think he'll need to scrap it as a professional and start from scratch. That's not encouraging. Nevertheless, on the whole, the blemishes are relatively minor for a player with such a good ceiling. Nikorak had a chance to climb this spring, but his velocity fluctuations instead caused him to drop a bit. That's not great.
Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: 99%


6. LHP Kolby Allard
Height/Weight: 6'0"/170 lbs.
Date of Birth: 8/13/97 (17)
School: High School (California)
What I Like: Low-90s heat with command, a low-80s curve with plenty of polish, and the room to grow another inch or two before he maxes out his frame. Allard is the closest thing to Aiken that I have seen in roughly nine years of following the draft. I absolutely adore the ceiling.
What I Don't Like: While he resembles Aiken in many ways, Allard lacks (1) the changeup, and (2) the size to fully own the comparison. His mechanics are a bit choppier as well. Unfortunately, the much bigger issue is his back. Allard didn't just miss the entire spring with a back injury: he missed the entire spring with the same back injury he had suffered earlier in high school. That's terrifying. Without access to the medicals, I had to drop Allard a bit.
Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: 99%


5. OF Daz Cameron
Height/Weight: 6'1"/190 lbs.
Date of Birth: 1/15/97 (18)
School: High School (Georgia)
What I Like: The pedigree (Dazmon is Mike Cameron's son), the body, and the all-around game. Cameron should be a plus glove man like his dad, but his offensive profile offers even a bit more to dream on with a smooth stroke. Currently it looks like Cameron would be a 10-15 home run player, but he physique offers enough to see 20-25 homer power at his peak. If he mirrors his dad that well, he's an extremely useful player.
What I Don't Like: I like the swing; I don't love the swing. It's a bit hitchy and a bit long for my taste. If the swing stays long and Cameron strikes out a lot, the profile moves from impact to useful. While it's still nice to get useful players in the top ten, I have a feeling that I'd be left wanting more. While it matters a ton that he should absolutely stick in center, I wish there was more ceiling realization to this point.
Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: 50%


4. RHP Jon Harris
Height/Weight: 6'4"/190 lbs.
Date of Birth: 10/15/93 (21)
School: Missouri St.
What I Like: A legitimate four-pitch mix. Harris has a solid, low-90s fastball with some sink, two breaking pitches (slider, curveball) that should be average offerings, and my favorite pitch: a genuine tumbling changeup. He's got the build to last. I initially had him 12th on this list, but I moved him way up after writing about him.
What I Don't Like: The breaking pitches don't do much for me at present. He won't need both, but I'd like to see the slider either kick up in velocity from 83 to 85+ or add some bite.

Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: 75%

3. RHP Carson Fulmer
Height/Weight: 5'11"/195 lbs.
Date of Birth: 10/15/93 (21)
School: Vanderbilt
What I Like: The stuff is huge, particularly the fastball. Fulmer sits at 94-95, even out of the stretch. His power curveball is devastating on right-handed hitters and he uses a two-seam diving fastball at 87-88 to keep lefties off balance. There's plenty of arsenal and a full season of starting to show that he can repeat his delivery just fine.
What I Don't Like: Despite the article linked above from Kiley McDaniel, Fulmer's size is still a bit alarming. On top of that, his mechanics are terrifying and unsurprisingly resulted in a bevy of walks this year. There's tons of ceiling, but there are plenty of areas where Fulmer could go wrong.

Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: 15%

2. LHP Brady Aiken
Height/Weight: 6'3"/210 lbs.
Date of Birth: 8/16/96 (18)
School: Prep School (Florida)
What I Like: Everything I liked about Aiken leading up to the 2014 draft. He's got the body, the arsenal, the mindset, and the pedigree to be a lefty ace. Those are valued about as highly as any asset in the game (consider that Cliff Lee, Cole Hamels, Jon Lester, Clayton Kershaw, and C.C. Sabathia all enjoy average annual values of at least $23M on their contracts). Aiken's value is through the roof, even with the Astros debacle in his rearview mirror. Aiken's mechanics have only the tiniest amount of unnecessary movement. Accordingly, he commands a mid-70s 12-6 curveball, a very good low-80s changeup, and a massive, mid-90s fastball with a hair of tail. Aiken's heater could be the best single pitch of any starting pitcher in the Majors in 2020. Additionally, even with a lost year, Aiken is reasonably young as he was drafted by Houston in 2014 as a 17-year-old. He's still on the proper developmental timeline.
What I Don't Like: While he's still on the right timeline, nobody gets better by going through the ordeal that the Astros put Aiken through last year and spending the subsequent year in purgatory. I don't like that he's essentially going to waste a developmental year, even if he's got the approach to put 2015 to good use. And obviously all of that was before Aiken actually had to undergo Tommy John surgery. Aiken's medicals are slowly making the rounds and while it's encouraging that nothing truly awful has leaked as of yet, it's tough not to be concerned about his UCL. All of that said: I'd take Aiken in a heartbeat. I still think that he's the best talent in this class, even though he's downgraded a hair for his injury history.
Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: 95%


1. SS Brendan Rodgers
Height/Weight: 6'0"/195 lbs.
Date of Birth: 8/9/96 (18)
School: High School (Florida)
What I Like: Rodgers has plenty of skills that function in much the same way as Addison Russell's. Though he doesn't figure to run particularly well, the bat, power, arm, and glove are all plus from a shortstop profile. That's still about as desirable as it gets.
What I Don't Like: I don't love what Rodgers does with his hands to generate his power. I'm worried that the length of his pre-pitch load and the moving pieces in his swing will lead to strikeout problems down the road. Yes, I still like Javier Baez and Russell. Perhaps this makes me a hypocrite and I should just get over myself, embrace Rodgers, and be done with it. And guess what? I'm finally there.
Likelihood of Player Being Available at #9: <1%


Parting Thoughts
Even in a down year for the draft, there's oodles of talent to be had. As the above shows, I have a strong preference for the arms in this class though Rodgers, Cameron, and Plummer would all leave me feeling plenty happy. No matter what, good scouting and development should add another impact level talent to the system.

Friday, May 1, 2015

Looking to the Rest of the Bears Draft

After selecting Kevin White with the #7 overall pick last night - an eminently reasonable choice that I fully support - new Bears GM Ryan Pace gets to continue overhauling his roster with the #39 and #71 choices tonight. Where might he look with such picks?

Earlier in the offseason prior to the beginning of free agency, I suggested that the Bears had the following level of need for each position group:

Extreme: Wide Receiver, Nose Tackle, Outside Linebacker, Inside Linebacker
High: Offensive Tackle, Center, Defensive End, Cornerback, Safety
Medium: Quarterback, Tight End, Guard
Low: Running Back
None: Specialists

That list reflected more of the long-term needs of the team. For example, the roster was full of players capable of playing the 3-4 OLB spot including Jared Allen, Willie Young, Shea McClellin, Cornelius Washington, and perhaps Christian Jones. However, only McClellin truly figures to fit as a 3-4 rush end, and even Shea may struggle in that role now having dropped significant weight last year in his transition from 4-3 end to 4-3 OLB. Accordingly, the need for a true 3-4 OLB was extreme.

However, free agency has updated that picture. As a reminder, here are the Bears' moves in free agency thus far:

OLB Pernell McPhee (5 years, $38.75M, $8.5M guaranteed)
WR Eddie Royal (3 years, $15.0M, $10.0M guaranteed)
S   Antrel Rolle (3 years, $11.25M, $4.9M guaranteed)
CB Alan Ball (1 year, $3.0M, $1.0M guaranteed)
DE Ray McDonald (1 year, $1.05M, $0 guaranteed)
C   Will Montgomery (1 year, $0.95M, $0.2M guaranteed)
DE Jarvis Jenkins (1 year, $0.825M, $0.33M guaranteed)
ILB Mason Foster (1 year, $0.825M, $0.08M guaranteed)
G   Vladimir Ducasse (1 year, $0.825M, $0.04M guaranteed)
OLB Sam Acho (1 year, $0.825M, $0.08M guaranteed)
RB Jacquizz Rodgers (1 year, $0.785M, $0.04M guaranteed)

Obviously the needs listed above are seriously impacted by those additions. With the selection of White last night and the free agents added over the course of the last two months, here is an updated look at the team needs:

Extreme: Nose Tackle
High: Offensive Tackle, Tight End, Inside Linebacker, Safety
Medium: Quarterback, Cornerback
Low: Running Back, Wide Receiver, Center, Guard, Defensive End, Outside Linebacker
None: Specialists

Well now, while this list may not be identical to that in the Bears draft room, I'm quite certain that the elephant in the room remains the gaping hole in the interior of the Bears' defense. While McDonald and Jenkins are only on one-year deals, the Bears have three returning players that figure to be good fits at the 3-4 end spot in Ego Ferguson, Lamarr Houston, and Jeremiah Ratliff. That trio should be able to provide good flexibility as all three have experience playing inside. While the outside positions on the roster have filled in nicely, the nose tackle spot is currently manned by....well, I'm not sure exactly. Last year's third-round-pick Will Sutton doesn't appear to be a particularly good fit at either spot, and none of the five listed above have the girth to fit inside.

Tight end has become a position of increasing need in light of Martellus Bennett's possible holdout. The position was already shallow behind Bennett to begin with, so any waffling on his status makes this a key concern. With Mason Foster and Jon Bostic currently penciled in as the starting inside linebackers, that position should be addressed. Ryan Mundy, Antrel Rolle, and Brock Vereen should form a competent trio of safeties, yet that position group is below average on paper and Rolle certainly isn't a spring chicken. Jordan Mills has graded as one of the worst starting tackles in the league each of the last two years and Jermon Bushrod has gotten older, making tackle a position that must be addressed as well. Finally, in the current NFL, a team can never have too many playable cornerbacks, a position at which the Bears currently lack.

Accordingly, the following players all fit the bill for the team with the #39 overall pick, starting with my favorite for the slot and finishing with my least favorite:

NT Jordan Phillips (Oklahoma)
ILB Benardrick McKinney (Mississippi St.)
OT Donovan Smith (Penn St.)
OT Jake Fisher (Oregon)
CB Jalen Collins (LSU)
NT Eddie Goldman (Florida St.)

TE Maxx Williams (Minnesota)
S   Landon Collins (Alabama)
CB Ronald Darby (Florida St.)
ILB Eric Kendricks (UCLA)
OLB Randy Gregory (Nebraska)
RB T.J. Yeldon (Alabama)

Phillips is the best fit: a true 3-4 nose with plenty of good tape and projectability. He's the kind of risky, high-upside pick I like. McKinney has been on my radar since the end of the college season as a massive (6'4", 246 lbs.); he also needs a big step or two in his play recognition development, but the athleticism is there to be a star. Fisher profiles as a strong right tackle with an outside shot to shift over to the left side; even if he stays on the right side, he offers a chance for a serious upgrade to the current Bears line. On the other hand, Smith was a four-year starter on the left side for the Nittany Lions, and while he never dominated, he very rarely lost his matchups. Smith comes with the benefit of being an absolute monster at 6'6", 338 lbs. Collins has the kind of size I like in an ace corner (6'1", 205 lbs.) with plenty of speed to go with it, even if his game film was a bit disappointing. Finally, Goldman figures to fill the middle much like Phillips, though I'm not sure that the ceiling is as high.

I left a gap between the first six and the next six intentionally as the second sextet all left me wanting more. Williams is fast and agile, but he's not nearly as big as the massive tight ends I like to see at just 6'4", 245 lbs. Collins figures to be an asset in run defense but a potential liability in pass defense. Darby looks the part of a useful corner, but at 5'11", 193 lbs., he lacks ideal size. Kendricks is a seriously undersized linebacker with injury problems but strong tape. Gregory has top-ten skill and production, but a series of off-the-field concerns leading up to the draft caused him to plummet. I won't pretend to know everything that is going on, but if the concerns are severe enough that he made it out of the first round, I'm not sure that the risk is worthwhile at #39 overall. Finally, I love watching Yeldon, but the Bears don't need a running back this year, so I'd much rather wait for them to grab one when the need is more desperate at that position and there are fewer concerns elsewhere on the roster (translated: don't draft a running back until you absolutely have to!).

While the options at #39 overall are relatively easy to peg with only six picks coming off the board prior to the Bears' pick, the options at #71 are much more open. Obviously any of the players listed above would be extremely attractive options so far down on the board, but I'll be surprised if any of them are available. With that in mind, here are some names to look for at #71:

NT Carl Davis (Iowa)
OT Daryl Williams (Oklahoma)
OT Tyrus Thompson (Oklahoma)
CB Eric Rowe (Utah)
S   Jaquiski Tartt (Samford)

TE Clive Walford (Miami)
LB Denzel Perryman (Miami)
CB Alex Carter (Stanford)
CB Quinten Rollins (Miami (OH))
CB P.J. Williams (Florida St.)

As above, there's a quintet that I like quite a bit and a quintet that would leave me satisfied but not thrilled.

Based on his production and physicality, Davis should have been a consideration at #39 above. However, Davis got a lot of bad press at the Combine and in its aftermath as teams were turned off by his attitude. His talent still makes him a worthwhile gamble, but I'd feel much better about him at #71 than at #39 given the concerns. He's entering a locker room in turmoil, not the solid structure of a place like New England or Baltimore.

Both Oklahoma tackles have the mauling size to be assets at either tackle spot while needing improvement in their pass blocking. That's hardly a deal-breaker with such good athletes in the third round.

Like Jalen Collins above, Rowe has the kind of size that I love in a cornerback at 6'1", 205 lbs. The other corners listed at the bottom - Carter, Rollins, and Williams - are all fine prospects, but they are all undersized with Williams having the double whammy of a slow Combine and post-Combine DUI. Not a strong combination.

Tartt has the kind of crazy athleticism and small-school mystique that makes him seem a bit risky, but a 6'1", 221 lbs. safety with a 4.53 40 certainly seems worth the gamble to me. The tape isn't convincing one way or the other due to the dearth of competition he faced at Samford, but he that's what coaching is for in my mind.

Walford isn't the most attractive tight end prospect I've seen, but I sure like the idea of getting my hands on a tight end from the U; too many great players have come through that pipeline to ignore Walford's strengths.

Perryman is a really good football player, but he is a little slow and very undersized as he stands just 5'10". I worry about his lacking frame at the next level.

Obviously there are dozens more names out there for this territory of the draft, any one of whom could be the right pick with the right skillset. I just don't want to see the Bears draft a quarterback. The odds of finding a useful starter outside of the top few picks are incredibly low even in spite of having seen a Super Bowl that featured a forming #75 overall pick (Russell Wilson) being outdueled by a former #199 overall pick (Tom Brady). It's possible that such a player is in this class (Garret Grayson? Brett Hundley? Bryce Petty?), but I just don't want the front office to spend that pick to find out. Perhaps that's dumb.

Before I end, here are a few quick-hit favorites of mine who may be available in the fourth round or later with a projected round in parentheses:

ILB Taiwan Jones (Michigan St.) (4th)
S   Kurtis Drummond (Michigan St.) (4th)
S   James Sample (Louisville) (4th)
ILB Paul Dawson (TCU) (4th)
TE Ben Koyack (Notre Dame) (5th)
CB Craig Mager (Texas State) (5th)
NT Ellis McCarthy (UCLA) (5th)
S   Gerod Holliman (Louisville) (5th)
ILB Mike Hull (Penn St.) (5th)
S   Adrian Amos (Penn St.) (5th)
CB Damian Swann (Georgia) (5th)
CB Ifo Ekpre-Olomu (Oregon) (6th)
NT Terry Williams (East Carolina) (6th)
ILB Reshard Cliett (South Florida) (6th)
C   Brandon Vitabile (Northwestern) (6th)

On that list, I'm particularly fond of Cliett. He's a fast linebacker, something the Bears desperately need to add to the mix.

With all of the above said, I'm primarily hoping that the Bears draft good players. If they draft good players, the future is bright. If they draft bad players, well...