Thursday, January 19, 2023

Alternate 2023 Chicago Bears Mock Offseason (Using Rich Hill Draft Value Chart)

I already spilled 4,300 words on a complete mock offseason here and prepared an alternate draft using the Jimmy Johnson draft pick value chart here, intentionally losing every trade. Those were both very fun and I hope you check them out.

The toughest part of mocks remains putting together trades that don't yield rolling eyes. So, I'm going to try one more mock offseason that takes the same free agent deals, the same starting draft position, and then runs back the draft, utilizing the Rich Hill trade value chart and hunting for the fairest deals possible according to that chart, not relying on the PFF mock draft tool to determine trade fairness. For purposes of this mock, future picks will be assumed to be mid-round selections, discounted by 25%.

Let's do this.

Bears trade #1 to Texans for #2, #33, #65, and #104
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 1,000 for 1,009 (717 + 180 + 78 + 34)

This value feels just about right. I can see settling into this zone, though I could also see the Bears settling at #65, #73, and #104. The chart sure does like this deal.

You know the drill now: the Bears then turn to the Colts, Raiders, Falcons, Panthers, Commanders, Titans, and maybe even the Lions or Jets to see who most desperately wants the QB of their choice. And they take the highest offer. Given the public comments from Colts GM Chris Ballard, I think he'll ultimately be the one to pony up.

Bears trade #2 to Colts for #4, #35, and #79
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 717 for 718 (491 + 170 + 57)

Wow. The Hill and Johnson charts see this deal playing out very similarly. Much, much lighter than Bears fans hope and assume.

Thankfully, there's still tons of value on the board: Stroud, Anderson, Murphy, Wilson, Bresee, etc. all remain available. Somebody wants Stroud, right?

Bears trade #4 to Raiders for #7 and #70
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 491 for 496 (426 + 70)

This is a moment where the value chart just doesn't come close to lining up with real world prices. But with all four of Anderson, Murphy, Wilson, and Bresee on the board, I'm happy to make the deal and let the teams ahead of me decide who I get...

As it turns out, this mock went off the rails with all four of Bryce Young, Will Levis, CJ Stroud, and Anthony Richardson going in the top six picks. Good grief. With only Carter and Murphy off the board, the pick at #7 is easy...

#7: Bears select Alabama DE Will Anderson Jr.
I shared thoughts on Anderson earlier. He's too good not to draft here.

Bears trade #33 to Buccaneers for #50, #82, and #154
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 180 for 182 (115 + 54 + 13)

This feels like pretty decent value here. Admittedly, it's tough to swallow trading down so far here, but the extra picks are necessary and the best players on the board aren't a good match for the Bears' needs.

Bears trade #35 to Panthers for #39 and #146
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 170  for 170 (153 + 17)

I think that the Bears would get a 4th here in real life, not a 5th.

#39: Bears select Tennessee OT Darnell Wright
Glad to see Wright again. I like him.

#50: Bears select Minnesota C John Michael Schmitz
A perfect landing spot. Schmitz can start at LG and work his way to C as Pocic ages. Perfect.

#54: Bears select Penn State WR Parker Washington
I think Washington climbs in the draft process. He's deceptively athletic, has good hands, and a YAC machine. He looks like a RB but plays as a true WR. I think he'd be a great fit in the Bears offense.

I felt confident taking Washington because (i) he's the only WR I liked in this zone, (ii) there were half a dozen edge rushers that I liked in the next batch of players, and (iii) I picked again in 10 picks. So what happens? Five straight edges to end the 2nd. Argh.

Bears Trade #64 and #217 to Cardinals for #66 and #178
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 83 (80 + 3) for 83 (76 + 7)

I like this deal.

#65: Bears select Iowa TE Sam LaPorta
Iowa TEs are probably the safest bets in the world of football.

#66: Bears select Wisconsin DT Keeanu Benton
This may be high for Benton, but he's the classic run stuffer in the heart of a defense.

Bears Trade #70, #154, and #178 to Jets for #74 and #112
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 90 (70 + 13 + 7) for 94 (64 + 30)

Bears Trade #74 to Chiefs for #94 and #133
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 64 for 63 (41 + 22)

#79: Bears select Texas OLB DeMarvion Overshown
Overshown is undersized, but the Bears desperately need a fast OLB.

#82: Bears select Notre Dame DE Isaiah Foskey
Every draft has a guy who falls and in this PFF mock, Foskey is a guy who sinks. He should be able to contribute early and h
as a good, though not elite, ceiling.

#94: Bears select Florida DT Gervon Dexter
The Bears end another slide and get a rotational defensive lineman.

Bears Trade #134 and #146 to Eagles for #95
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 39 (22 + 17) for 40

I really liked two of the CBs on the board here -- Utah's Clark Phillips III and Texas A&M's Jaylon Jones -- as well as as pair of non-corners -- USC G Andrew Vorhees and Notre Dame S Brandon Joseph. This trade up was an easy choice.

#95: Bears select USC G Andrew Vorhees
Vorhees could be a plug-and-play starter. Easy pick.

Bears Trade #104 and #136 to Browns for #99 and #143
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 55 (34 + 21) for 55 (37 + 18)

#96: Bears select Utah CB Clark Phillips III
Did I need to come up for Phillips? I don't know. But I'm glad that I did. I like him despite the small stature.

#103: Bears select Ole Miss RB Zach Evans
Evans has the frame and skills to be an every-down back.

#112: Bears select Princeton WR Andrei Iosivas
Big, productive, and fast...but in the Ivy League. This is a great spot for the unknown Tiger.

Bears trade DE Trevis Gipson to Chiefs for #123
Gipson
plateaued in 2022 and he has the unfortunate reality of having been brought in my the Ryan Pace regime. The Chiefs gladly trade a Day Three pick for a fringe starter during their window of contention.

#123: Bears select Auburn OLB Owen Pappoe
Pappoe was never particularly scary at Auburn, but all of the measurables are there to be a force. It's worth a shot.

#133: Bears select Iowa CB Riley Moss
Moss has a big enough body to be a versatile piece in the defensive backfield.

#143: Bears select Florida S Rashad Torrence II
Torrence plays a similar style to Jaquan Brisker, but he may also have just enough quickness to spend some time in the slot.

Bears Trade #149 to Buccaneers for #154 and #235
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 15 for 15 (13 + 2)

#154: Bears select Kansas State RB Deuce Vaughn
Vaughn is a complementary piece as a quick back who can be used as a pass catcher out of the backfield. Very different from Evans.

#235: Bears select Michigan K Jake Moody
Is it necessary to use this pick on Moody? Perhaps, perhaps not. But he represents a delightful upgrade over Cairo Santos on a cheaper deal, and I like getting control of Moody's rights via the selection.

Following the free agency and draft above, below is the final roster for 2023. Free agents signings are italicized and draftees are bolded.

QB: Justin Fields, Trevor Siemian

HB: Khalil Herbert, Zach Evans, Trestan Ebner, Deuce Vaughn

FB: __________

WR: Chase Claypool, Darnell Mooney, Parker Washington, Velus Jones Jr., Equanimeous St. Brown, Andrei Iosivas

TE: Cole Kmet, Sam LaPorta____________

OT: Braxton Jones, Darnell Wright, Larry Borom, Alex Leatherwood

OG: Teven Jenkins, Andrew Vorhees, Ja'Tyre Carter

CEthan Pocic, John Michael Schmitz Doug Kramer

DEMarcus Davenport, Will Anderson Jr., Isaiah Foskey, Dominique Robinson, Clelin Ferrell Trevis Gipson

DTJavon Hargrave, Sheldon RankinsKeeanu BentonGervon Dexter

OLBDavid LongDeMarvion Overshown, Owen Pappoe

ILB: Jack Sanborn, ____________,

CB: Jaylon Johnson, Kyler Gordon, Clark Phillips III, Kindle Vildor, Riley Moss, Jaylon Jones

S: Eddie Jackson, Jaquan Brisker, Rashad Torrence IIDeAndre Houston-CarsonElijah Hicks

STJake Moody, Trenton Gill, Patrick Scales, Cairo Santos

This mock represents a middle ground between the earliest mock and the losing mock: it does feel like most every position group is "fixed" yet, most notably, there aren't any additional picks added to the war chest for 2024 and beyond.

It's amazing how many holes can be filled with 17 draft picks!

Wednesday, January 18, 2023

Alternate 2023 Chicago Bears Mock Offseason (using Jimmy Johnson Draft Chart)

I already spilled 4,300 words on a complete mock offseason here. It was very fun and I hope you check it out.

The toughest part of that mock, as with any mock: putting together trades that don't yield rolling eyes. So, I'm going to try another mock offseason that takes the same free agent deals, the same starting draft position, and then runs back the draft, intentionally losing each deal on the Jimmy Johnson trade value chart. For purposes of this mock, future picks will be assumed to be mid-round selections, discounted by 25%.

Let's do this.

Bears trade #1 to Texans for #2, #65, and #104
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 3,000 for 2,951 (2,600 + 265 + 86)

This value feels low, especially in light of the Bears-49ers trade in 2017 to move from #3 to #2 that cost two 3rds and a 4th. But I'm losing every deal. Good start.

The Bears then turn to the Colts, Raiders, Falcons, Panthers, Commanders, Titans, and maybe even the Lions or Jets to see who most desperately wants the QB of their choice. And they take the highest offer. Given the public comments from Colts GM Chris Ballard, I think he'll ultimately be the one to pony up.

Bears trade #2 to Colts for #4, #35, and #79
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 2,600 for 2,545 (1,800 + 550 + 195)

Getting one 3rd instead of a 2024 1st and 2nd is much less fun. But I lost again, per the rules.

Thankfully, there's still tons of value on the board: Stroud, Carter, Murphy, Wilson, Bresee, etc. all remain available. Somebody wants Stroud, right?

Bears trade #4, #79, and #149 to Raiders for #7 and #38
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 2,025.2 (1,800 + 195 + 30.2) for 2,020 (1,500 + 520)

This deal seems downright unrealistic, though it does still kick Stroud to a non-Lions team (though in this mock, the Raiders took Carter and the Lions got Stroud anyway).

#7: Bears select Clemson DT Bryan Bresee
The centerpiece of the defensive line rebuild better come in free agency. The capstone, however, comes here as Bresee is an explosive force from day one. I still prefer Clemson DE Myles Murphy, but I don't think he gets out of the top five. Bresee is disruptive, though it renders my free agent acquisitions less than ideal. Tyree Wilson could've been the pick, but Bresee is too good in a draft shallow on impact DTs.

Bears trade #35 to Saints for #40, #147, and #186
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 550  for 546.4 (500 + 31 + 15.4)

Still plenty of good players on the board, but this trade down is less fun than getting #71.

Bears trade #38 and #186 to Falcons for #44 and #110
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 535.4 (520 + 15.4)  for 534 (460 + 74)

#40: Bears select Arkansas LB Drew Sanders
OLB definitely isn't the biggest need, especially in an era where the nickel is the base defense. But Sanders justifies deviating from linemen here for me. I'm a huge fan of his and think that he'd be a plug and play three-down starter.

#44: Bears select Tennessee North Dakota State OT Cody Mauch
Mauch might be the most different lineman in the entire draft as compared to Darnell Wright, my earlier pick. But he's a nice, athletic RT prospect.

#54: Bears select Kansas State DE Felix Anudike-Uzomah
This is
great value, just like it was earlier. Anudike-Uzomah is very strong with an NFL body. His selection is bad news for Trevis Gipson.

Bears Trade #64 to Rams for #69, #170, and #254
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 270 for 267.8 (245 + 21.8 + 1)

This was a bad trade, as the Rams jumped me for Jalin Hyatt.

Bears Trade #65 to Packers for #78 and #116
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 265 for 262 (200 + 62)

#69: Bears select Iowa TE Sam LaPorta
Iowa TEs are probably the safest bets in the world of football.

#78: Bears select Maryland CB Deonte Banks
Banks is a great fit in a zone-heavy scheme with a long frame and long arms. I'm always on the lookout for the next Peanut Tillman, and Banks has the body to get there, though he also lacks the speed to get drafted much higher than this. Drafting Banks enables Kyler Gordon to spend even more time in the slot.

#103: Bears select Texas A&M CB Jaylon Jones
Very much not a position of need, but Jones represents marvelous value here.

#104: Bears select Wake Forest WR A.T. Perry
Not the ideal outcome for the WR upgrade, but that's not Perry's fault. He's plenty interesting in his own right. Long, lanky, and extremely productive even against Clemson, Perry is a strong addition to the club.

#110: Bears select Notre Dame S Brandon Joseph
No need to trade for Joseph here. He's a nice addition to the roster.

#116: Bears select South Carolina DT Zacch Pickens
Pickens isn't a great fit on the roster at the moment either, but as a productive five-star in a big frame, he's strong value here.

Bears trade DE Trevis Gipson to Chiefs for #123
Gipson plateaued in 2022 and he has the unfortunate reality of having been brought in my the Ryan Pace regime. The Chiefs gladly trade a Day Three pick for a fringe starter during their window of contention.

#123: Bears select Tulane RB Tyjae Spears
I was high on him before the Cotton Bowl. Now everyone is high on Spears. I take Spears in every mock.

Bears trade #147 and #170 to Bengals for #130 and #203
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 52.8 (31 + 21.8) for 50.6 (42 +8.6)

#130: Bears select Princeton WR Andrei Iosivas
Big, productive, and fast...but in the Ivy League. This is a great spot for the unknown Tiger.

#134: Bears select Michigan C Olusegun Oluwatimi
I don't understand why his profile is so low. Perhaps we'll find out in the coming months. For now, I'll take my cha
nces with a Michigan interior offensive lineman.

#145: Bears select Eastern Michigan DE Jose Ramirez
This is the perfect spot for a twitchy pass rusher, albeit one in need of more development.

#203: Bears select Alabama TE Cameron Latu
Latu is raw and will need serious development. That's what the late 6th round is for, right?

#217: Bears select Pittsburgh LB SirVocea Dennis
Dennis isn't a tremendous athlete, but what do you expect here?

#254: Bears select Michigan K Jake Moody
Is it necessary to use this pick on Moody? Perhaps, perhaps not. But he represents a delightful upgrade over Cairo Santos on a cheaper deal, and I like getting control of Moody's rights via the selection.

Following the free agency and draft above, below is the final roster for 2023. Free agents signings are italicized and draftees are bolded.

QB: Justin Fields, Trevor Siemian

HB: Khalil Herbert, Tyjae Spears, Trestan Ebner, __________

FB: __________

WR: Chase Claypool, Darnell Mooney, A.T. Perry, Velus Jones Jr., Equanimeous St. Brown, Andrei Iosivas

TE: Cole Kmet, Sam LaPorta, Cameron Latu

OT: Braxton Jones, Cody Mauch, Larry Borom, Alex Leatherwood

OG: Teven Jenkins, Ja'Tyre Carter

CEthan Pocic, Olusegun Oluwatimi, Doug Kramer

DEMarcus Davenport, Felix Anudike-Uzomah, Jose Ramirez, Dominique Robinson, Clelin Ferrell Trevis Gipson

DTJavon Hargrave, Sheldon RankinsBryan Bresee, Zacch Pickens

OLBDavid LongDrew Sanders, ____________

ILB: Jack Sanborn, SirVocea Dennis

CB: Jaylon Johnson, Kyler Gordon, Deonte Banks, Jaylon Jones (A&M), Kindle Vildor, Elijah Hicks, Jaylon Jones (Ole Miss)

S: Eddie Jackson, Jaquan Brisker, Brandon Joseph, DeAndre Houston-Carson___________

ST: Jake Moody, Trenton Gill, Patrick Scales, Cairo Santos

There are some really obvious changes from the earlier mock: the wide receiver additions are far less captivating, the offensive line got a boost but doesn't feel fixed in the same way, and, most notably, there aren't any additional picks added to the war chest for 2024 and beyond.

On the other hand, the DT group is comically better than at present and the defensive backfield looks fantastic. The open competition for the LG spot to fill the 5th job on the line with Jones-?????-Pocic-Jenkins-Mauch has five viable candidates, and that's not a bad thing. But this mock draft leaves the Bears hoping that Claypool is a revelation when healthy, Perry and/or Iosivas emerge immediately, or Velus Jones takes a leap in year two.

Building the 2023 Chicago Bears: A Full Mock Offseason

The 2022 Bears were a dreadful football team. But as anyone who followed the approach of new general manager Ryan Poles can attest, they were dreadful in the most perfect way: they lost their way to the #1 overall pick in the 2023 draft and they cemented Justin Fields as The One for the franchise.

It's no surprise, then, that the 2023 offseason is a pivotal one for the club. The Bears have two more years with Fields on a cheap rookie deal before his fifth-year option in 2025 and a massive extension to follow. The Bears need to surround Fields with more toys while building a front seven defensively nearly from scratch (thank goodness for Jack Sanborn). Free agency and the draft will be crucial.

Before getting there, however, here's the way the roster stands before the offseason commences. The below assumes that the Bears make a pair of obvious cuts in longtime G Cody Whitehair and free agent flop DE Al-Quadin Muhammad; I also project them to cut DT Justin Jones and C Lucas Patrick despite the relative meager cap savings there (and the fact that Poles raved about Jones). Cutting the quartet yields only $12.5425M of additional cap space in 2023, mostly from Whitehair ($8.06M), but more importantly, they trim the fat from the roster as it turns over.

QB: Justin Fields, Trevor Siemian

HB: Khalil Herbert, Trestan Ebner, __________, __________

FB: __________

WR: Chase Claypool, Darnell Mooney, Velus Jones Jr., Equanimeous St. Brown, __________, __________

TE: Cole Kmet, __________, __________, __________

OT: Braxton Jones, Larry Borom, Alex Leatherwood, __________

OG: Teven Jenkins, Ja'Tyre Carter, __________

C: Doug Kramer, __________

DE: Trevis Gipson, Dominique Robinson, __________, __________, __________

DT: __________, __________, __________, __________

OLB: __________, __________, __________

ILB: Jack Sanborn, __________

CB: Jaylon Johnson, Kyler Gordon, Kindle Vildor, Elijah Hicks, Jaylon Jones, __________

S: Eddie Jackson, Jaquan Brisker, __________, __________, __________

ST: Cairo Santos, Trenton Gill, __________

Perhaps surprisingly, there are a couple of position groups in good shape on this roster. Namely, the quarterback room doesn't scream out for an upgrade for the first time in...my entire life? Wow. Additionally, the secondary is strong. The weak position groups, however, need an incredible amount of turnover. So let's get to it.

First, the Bears should bring back a couple of special teams mainstays, ideally also keeping a 2022 acquisition who flashed while dealing with injuries.

Bears sign LS Patrick Scales and FS DeAndre Houston-Carson to minimum-salary deals

With the resignings out of the way, we turn to the market where the Bears figure to spend big. The needs are voluminous, so we'll deal with them one group at a time.

While both Trevis Gipson and Dominique Robinson have flashed, the Bears need two new starting defensive ends. Free agency offers a number of intriguing options. Importantly, the draft is deep with edge defenders but relatively modest at DT. DEs that jump out to me:

  1. Marcus Davenport (27): Davenport has largely disappointed as a former 1st rounder with the Saints, but he erupted with a massive 2021 season which he promptly followed with only half a sack in 2022. That's deceptive as Davenport continued to generate consistent pressure, but the lack of sacks will likely depress his market a bit. I project him for $100M over five years. 
  2. Jadeveon Clowney (30): Clowney is a big name nearing the end of a useful career, albeit not an elite one. He'd be a solid starter on a short deal at something like $11M per year.
  3. Clelin Ferrell (26): Ferrell hasn't been good with the Raiders. But he's not bad, he's young, and it isn't his fault that they took him 4th overall when most had him pegged in the second half of the first round. I love Ferrell as something like $5M on a one-year deal, acknowledging that something seems off with the Raiders franchise.
  4. Dawuane Smoot (28): He'd project to a swing role. Solid pass rushing. 2 years at $12M per should work.
  5. Samson Ebukam (28): A part-time player, he's probably too small for what the Bears need. Maybe $8M per over three years.
  6. Zach Allen (26). Allen is young, big, and productive. He'd be a nice target on a deal similar to Smoot, albeit for an extra year or two.

In the end, Davenport offers a much higher ceiling than the others. He'll get paid like a star even though he isn't one. So it goes in free agency.

Bears sign DE Marcus Davenport to a 5-year, $100M deal

Bears sign DE Clelin Ferrell to a 1-year, $5M deal

The DT spot is just as essential, if not more so, than the DE need. Unfortunately for the Bears, the top option in free agency won't likely reach free agency. So here goes:

  1. Da'Ron Payne (26): Payne is the clear-cut top free agent defensive lineman, and if he reaches free agency, the Bears will pay him whatever he wants to get him to Chicago. There's a small chance that Washington lets him hit the market given their recent extension of Jonathan Allen and upcoming needs for Chase Young and Montez Sweat. But no. He's not reaching free agency. The Commanders will slap the franchise tag on him and figure out the cap situation later. If he reaches free agency, he's another 5-year, $100M deal.
  2. Javon Hargrave (30): Despite his age, Hargrave is the clear #2 option after Payne. He's been extremely productive for many years now. Coming off of a three-year, $39M deal, I think he'll nab another three-year deal at $16M per. 
  3. Dalvin Tomlinson (29): Tomlinson is much less flashy than Payne, but he's better than anything the Bears have currently. $12M per for three years should work.
  4. A'Shawn Robinson (28): I loved Robinson in the draft, but he hasn't really made it as a pro. Oh well. Similar deal to Tomlinson.
  5. Sheldon Rankins (29): Rankins is another plug-and-play starter who figures to command a bit less than the names above. Maybe $10M per for two years.
  6. Chris Wormley (29): Wormley is smaller and less productive, but he would provide a solid rotational piece on short deal, something like two years at $6M per year.
Bears sign DT Javon Hargrave to a 3-year, $50M deal
Bears sign DT Sheldon Rankins to a 2-year, $20M deal

If the Bears strike out on one or more of their top defensive line prospects, they could pivot to the top of the linebacker market. Linebacker targets:

  1. Tremaine Edmunds (25). Definitely the top linebacker target, I think Edmunds gets something like $68M over four years. Thanks for pushing the market upward, Roquan!
  2. The remaining linebacker targets are all outside linebackers, none of whom really move the needle in a huge way. Kaden Elliss (28) (2yr @ $6M AAV), Germaine Pratt (27) (4yr @ $8M AAV), and David Long (26) (2yr @ $5M AAV) all fit the bill of bit piece. Only TJ Edwards (27) (5yr @ $14M AAV) really moves the needle, but it's hard to see him getting out of Philly.
Bears sign OLB David Long to a 2-year, $10M deal

The defensive backfield will probably get a piece from the draft, but free agency doesn't make much sense.

This moves us to the offense. There are some serious needs on the offensive side. To me, the most important target is to find a quality, vetern center for Fields. Thankfully, this is a great year to need a quality, veteran center.
  1. Ethan Pocic (28): Pocic has a solid pedigree and doesn't figure to break the bank. Nice.
  2. Bradley Bozeman (28): Whereas Pocic is a bit undersized, Bozeman is massive. He's also not as good.
  3. Connor McGovern (30): McGovern is the top of the market and his price tag figures to go there. Unfortunately, at 30, he doesn't figure to age quite as well with Fields especially not on a long-term deal at something like $13M per.
  4. Garrett Bradbury (28): Bradbury has the pedigree as a former 1st rounder who finally put it together in 2022. He's a strong option.
Bears sign C Ethan Pocic to a 4-year, $36M deal

The Bears should be steering clear of Orlando Brown Jr. Brown is solid, but he's not an elite LT despite the fact that he's about to get paid like one. Elgton Jenkins extending with the Packers really cut down this market. Thankfully, the interior offensive line options in the draft are generally strong. If the Bears elect to pour into the guard or RT spots, there are some solid options like Evan Brown (27) (3yr @ $11M AAV), Nate Davis (27) (3yr @ $8M), or Isaac Seumalo (30) (2yr @ $12M AAV).

The Bears will bring in at least two additional tight ends, but given Cole Kmet's development in recent years, they're unlikely to swim near the top of the free agent market. Perhaps a deal for someone like Austin Hooper (28) makes sense on a short-term deal like $8M per year over two years.

The wide receiver market is bad. There's no sugarcoating it. The only two meaningful options are JuJu Smith-Schuster (26) and Mecole Hardman (25), each of whom figures to get something like $15M per year in the aftermath of Christian Kirk's deal despite not justifying anything close to that.

Finaly, there's the extremely overloaded running back market. Elite targets like Saquon Barkley (26), Josh Jacobs (25), and Miles Sanders (26) figure to get franchise tagged. Even Tony Pollard (26) may get tagged. Ironically, this may make it tougher for the Bears to bring back David Montgomery (26) as he doesn't figure to get tagged, thus making him arguably the top option on the market. This is my ideal offseason, though, so we're not spending free agent dollars on a running back.

Tally it all up and here's my ideal free agency spending spree:

Ideal Free Agency

  1. Sign DE Marcus Davenport for 5 years, $100M.
  2. Sign DT Javon Hargrave for 3 years, $50M.
  3. Sign DT Sheldon Rankins for 2 years, $20M.
  4. Sign C Ethan Pocic for 4 years, $36M.
  5. Sign OLB David Long for 2 years, $10M.
  6. Sign DE Clelin Ferrell for 1 year, $5M.
  7. Sign S DeAndre Houston-Carson for 1 year, $1.5M.
  8. Sign LS Patrick Scales for 1 year, $1.3M.
The above signings allocate $70M of AAV under the cap even without pushing cap hits down the road, well short of the Bears' approximately $110M. This leaves lots of space for extensions, too. They also set up the team well in a draft that is loaded with CBs and DEs while being quite light on DTs.

(I'd also be happy to see N'Keal Harry come back on an inexpensive deal, but something seems off with Harry; nobody is talking him up and he can't get on the field.)

With the roster having received a massive jolt from free agency, the Bears should find themselves entering draft weekend far less desperate than they are right now. This should offer numerous opportunities to utilize the #1 overall pick in an effort to add depth to a roster sorely in need of young talent to complement the bevy of free agent additions.

But how to do so? There are three real options:
  1. Keep the pick and take the draft's best overall player. Whoever this player ends up being, it's highly unlikely that he'll offer sufficient value to the roster to pass up the bevy of picks that #1 overall could return in a trade.
    1. I don't see a player in this draft who justifies such a selection. Alabama DE Will Anderson is incredibly quick and polished...but he's also under 240 pounds. Georgia DT Jalen Carter is a freakish athlete and productive player, but it's tough to justify taking a DT at #1. The other defenders haven't pushed themselves up this high yet in draft consideration.
  2. Make one trade to the highest bidder. There are numerous options here, and if one club falls in love with one quarterback, perhaps they'd be willing to pay enough of a premium to justify one trade.
    1. The PFF mock draft simulator provides some vague simulation possibilities. For example, if the Panthers think that their roster is ready to take the mantel from Tom Brady in the NFC South once they fix their quarterback position and they offer a king's ransom to move from #9 to #1, Ryan Poles will listen. Poles will likely pull the trigger for something like Carolina's 1st rounders in 2023, 2024, and 2025, 2nds in 2023 and 2024, and Carolina's 3rd in 2025 along with San Francisco's 2nd in 2023.
    2. Another example: the Raiders could trade Derek Carr, then flip their 1sts and 2nds in 2023, 2024, and 2025 for #1 overall.
  3. Trade down a couple of times to maximize the overall haul of picks. Far and away, this is my favorite option. The Bears make it abundantly clear that they're trading #1 overall to the top bidder. The Texans spend months falling in love with their top QB target, and in an effort to ensure that they don't lose him, they send a package of picks to move from #2 to #1. Then, the Bears find another team that has fallen in love with one of the other QBs and swap with them to move up to #2 to get their guy. So here we go!
Thankfully, we have some precedent for a one-spot move near the top of the draft. Unfortunately, the precedent comes from the Bears' nightmarish deal in 2017 to land Mitchell Trubisky. In that deal, the Bears sent the 49ers #67, #111, and a 2018 3rd round pick to move from #3 to #2.

The Bears should be able to command a slightly greater premium for Houston to move from #2 to #1. With that in mind, in the day's leading up to the draft, they kick off this trading frenzy:

(each trade includes the Jimmy Johnson chart value -- which still appears to hold major sway in the NFL -- with future picks estimate and discounted by 25%)

Bears trade #1 to Texans for #2, #65, #73, and Houston's 2024 3rd
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 3,000 for 3,225 (2,600 + 265 + 225 + 135)
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 1,000 for 902 (717 + 78 + 65 + 42)

The only difference between the Bears-49ers trade in 2017 and this trade is that the Texans surrender the 2023 3rd that they acquired from Cleveland instead of sending a 4th. Could the Bears get even more from Houston? Possibly, but this is still plenty fair in my mind.

(The mock draft that follows uses the PFF mock draft simulator and assumes that the Bears have their own picks in the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 7th rounds in addition to Baltimore's 2nd, Philly's 4th, and New England's 5th. The actual draft slots are occasionally off by a spot, but that doesn't meaningfully change the projection.)

The Bears then turn to the Colts, Raiders, Falcons, Panthers, Commanders, Titans, and maybe even the Lions or Jets to see who most desperately wants the QB of their choice. And they take the highest offer. Given the public comments from Colts GM Chris Ballard, I think he'll ultimately be the one to pony up.

Bears trade #2 to Colts for #4, #35, and Indianapolis's 2024 1st and 2nd
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 2,600 for 3,273 (1,800 + 550 + 638 + 285)
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 717 for 945 (491 + 170 + 202 + 82)

Boom. This trade resets the Bears' war chest in a huge way. Assuming that a QB and Anderson/Carter go 2nd and 3rd, the Bears have their pick of the litter of the remaining top defensive prospects: whichever of Anderson or Carter didn't go 3rd, Clemson DT Bryan Bresee, Clemson DE Myles Murphy, and Texas Tech DE Tyree Wilson. They could also pivot to Northwestern OT Peter Skoronski, who is magnificently following in Rashawn Slater's footsteps.

Then again, they could instead survey the field, determine that they have tons of quality targets still on their board, and trade down again. Given that Murphy is my favorite defender on the board given his very high floor, that's the path we're taking here.

Bears trade #4 to Raiders for #7, #38, #70, and #109
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 1,800 for 2,336 (1,500 + 520 + 240 + 76)
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 491 for 685 (426 + 157 + 70 +32)

This deal would result in a dream come true: it pushes the third quarterback to the AFC and ensures that the Lions don't acquire a QB better than Jared Goff. Standing pat at #4 very likely results in the Lions nabbing a higher ceiling at QB, though it doesn't cut down Detroit's massive draft capital while enriching the depth of the Bears organization. Dealing with Detroit would also be a worthy move; the Bears aren't in a spot to get choosy about their trade partners or worry about adding too much talent to an opponent.

#7: Bears select Alabama DE Will Anderson
The centerpiece of the defensive line rebuild better come in free agency. The capstone, however, comes here as Anderson is an explosive force from day one. I actually prefer Clemson DE Myles Murphy, but I don't know think he gets out of the top five. It's unlikely that Anderson gets here either, but he did in this mock, and in any draft where all three of Bryce Young, CJ Stroud, and Will Levis go in the top five, somebody will slip who shouldn't. For purposes of the rebuild, if this is Anderson or Murphy, I'll be ecstatic.

I do worry about Anderson's weight. But there's no denying that he's relentless and spent the last few years as the explosive heart of Alabama's defense. He could be a menace to opposing QBs for years. I like him a lot better at #7 than I do in the top two.

Bears trade #35 to Saints for #40 and #71
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 550  for 735 (500 + 235)
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 170 for 217 (149 + 68)

This trade is a no-brainer at this point in the draft to me. There are about a dozen quality players here; picking up an extra 3rd to slide back a few spots is a definte yes.

#38: Bears select Arkansas LB Drew Sanders
OLB definitely isn't the biggest need, especially in an era where the nickle is the base defense. But Sanders justifies deviating from linemen here for me. I'm a huge fan of his and think that he'd be a plug and play three-down starter.

Bears trade #40 to Falcons for #44 and #75
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 500 for 675 (460 + 215)
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 149 for 198 (135 + 63)

The Bears need to make a couple of deals like this, trading back to acquire additional picks or to trade way up with other picks. With a handful of linemen on the board, trading back works. In the end, trading down from #35 to #44 netted two 3rds.

#44: Bears select Tennessee OT Darnell Wright
Wright may not make it this far on draft day. He's likely to be a significant riser given his frame and athleticism.

#54: Bears select Kansas State DE Felix Anudike-Uzomah
This is great value. Anudike-Uzomah is very strong with an NFL body. His selection is bad news for Trevis Gipson.

Bears Trade #75 and #109 to Giants for #57
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 291 (215 + 76) for 330
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 95 (63 + 32) for 96

A trade up! I rarely approve. But there's one receiver who I love here...

#57: Bears select Penn State WR Parker Washington
I don't think that the Bears are going to completely rework their receiver room this year. Improving the offensive line and the defense are the best ways to relieve pressure on Justin Fields. But a reliable security blanket in the slot would be wonderfully helpful.

#64: Bears select Bowling Green DT Karl Brooks
Brooks has become a real favorite of mine. He's a much bigger Dominique Robinson, big enough to slide inside and wreak havoc with his extremely athletic frame. Brooks was also extremely productive in college. He was a menacing edge rusher at 6-4, 300 lbs., but I think he's an ideal three technique who can even carry a bit more weight.

#65: Bears select Tennessee WR Jalin Hyatt
Another guy who did nothing in college before exploding for one year at Tennessee who the Bears draft in the third round? Meh. I get the Velus Jones Jr. comp. But I'm still rolling the dice on Hyatt here.

#70: Bears select Iowa TE Sam LaPorta
Iowa TEs are probably the safest bets in the world of football.

#71: Bears select Maryland CB Deonte Banks
Banks is a great fit in a zone-heavy scheme with a long frame and long arms. I'm always on the lookout for the next Peanut Tillman, and Banks has the body to get there, though he also lacks the speed to get drafted much higher than this. Drafting Banks enables Kyler Gordon to spend even more time in the slot.

Bears trade #73 to Chargers for #85 and a 2024 3rd
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 225 for 304 (165 + 139)
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 65 for 92 (50 + 42)

Grab an extra pick, especially when there isn't an obvious pick to be made here.

#85: Bears select Ohio State OT Dawand Jones
There were other players here that I liked better and even some quality trade-down options. But Jones is too intriguing. He's an absolute mountain of a man at 6-8, 360 lbs. and a true mauler in the run game. Does he have the feet to play RT in the NFL? No, I don't think so...but if he does, he's a star. If he doesn't, he can maul from a guard spot instead where lacking quickness is less of a problem. Either Wright or Jones can slide inside to get the best five on the field.

#103: Bears select TCU C Steve Avila
Avila might be a G in the NFL, but that's not a problem and it's nice to have a guy with lots of experience at C on the roster. Avila is massive, but he probably needs a bit of time to get into better shape. No problem. The Bears can give him that time.

Bears Trade #134, #136, and #217 to Texans for #104
Jimmy Johnson chart evaluation: Bears trade 80 (39 + 38 + 3) for 86
Rich Hill chart evaluation: Bears trade 20 (19+18+3) for 34

What's this? Another trade up? Another trade up! I'm not supposed to fall in love with one player, but that's precisely what I did here. Sue me.

#104: Bears select Notre Dame S Brandon Joseph
Joseph struggled in 2022, in large part due to injuries. Here's hoping he can eventually regain the form that made him a star at Northwestern before his transfer. He brings a bit of extra value as a punt returner.

Bears trade DE Trevis Gipson to Chiefs for #123
Gipson plateaued in 2022 and he has the unfortunate reality of having been brought in my the Ryan Pace regime. The Chiefs gladly trade a Day Three pick for a fringe starter during their window of contention.

#123: Bears select Tulane RB Tyjae Spears
I was high on him before the Cotton Bowl. Now everyone is high on Spears.

#149: Bears select Western Kentucky DT Brodric Martin
Martin is massive. Truly massive. He can start out in goal line sets, then try to grow his reps from there.

Following the free agency and draft above, below is the final roster for 2023. Free agents signings are italicized and draftees are bolded.

QB: Justin Fields, Trevor Siemian

HB: Khalil Herbert, Tyjae Spears, Trestan Ebner, __________

FB: __________

WR: Chase Claypool, Darnell Mooney, Parker Washington, Velus Jones Jr., Equanimeous St. Brown, Jalin Hyatt

TE: Cole Kmet, Sam LaPorta, __________

OT: Braxton Jones, Darnell Wright, Dawand Jones, Larry Borom, Alex Leatherwood

OG: Teven Jenkins, Ja'Tyre Carter

C: Ethan Pocic, Steve Avila, Doug Kramer

DE: Marcus Davenport, Will Anderson, Felix Anudike-Uzomah, Dominique Robinson, Clelin Ferrell Trevis Gipson

DT: Javon Hargrave, Sheldon Rankins, Karl Brooks, Brodric Martin

OLB: David Long, Drew Sanders, ____________

ILB: Jack Sanborn, __________

CB: Jaylon Johnson, Kyler Gordon, Deonte Banks, Kindle Vildor, Elijah Hicks, Jaylon Jones

S: Eddie Jackson, Jaquan Brisker, Brandon Joseph, DeAndre Houston-Carson, ___________

ST: Cairo Santos, Trenton Gill, Patrick Scales

The Bears need another tight end and some more linebackers, but this roster doesn't look anything like the scrub-laden group assembled for the 2022 tank. In addition to that wildly improved roster, the Bears find themselves heading into the 2024 draft with the following picks:

1st: Chicago
1st: Indianapolis
2nd: Chicago
2nd: Indianapolis

3rd: Chicago
3rd: Houston
3rd: Los Angeles Chargers
4th: Chicago

5th: Chicago
6th: Chicago
7th: Chicago

(A final note: it certainly appears that the PFF trade simulator is more permissive than it should be as the Bears "won" their trades above to the tune of 1,918 points on the Jimmy Johnson chart, equivalent to the 4th overall pick and change, and 419 points on the Rich Hill chart, equivalent to nearly the 7th overall pick. To be fair, Ryan Pace gave away value in excess of #1 overall during his tenure using the Chase Stuart pick value chart...and that's before the Justin Fields trade that yielded Justin Fiels for the Bears with the 11th pick (yay!) at the cost of picks #7, #20, #112, and #164 (yikes!). Regardless, if the Bears getting marginally worse picks back in every deal, I still vastly prefer this approach to one where the Bears get only one pick in the top-50 this spring.)

Tuesday, August 30, 2022

Penn State and Big Ten Football 2022 Season Picks

I'm stoked. On Thursday, I'm taking my daughters (the big ones) to Penn State's opener in West Lafayette against Purdue. It's an exciting way to start the season. For the Nittany Lions team, it's also a brutally difficult way to start the season. Obviously Ohio State's tilt against Notre Dame represents the most challenging Week One opponent for a Big Ten team, but traveling to Purdue is undeniably then next toughest opponent for a team in the East.

Thankfully for Penn State, Purdue is an ideal matchup. More on that below.

Offense

The strength of Penn State's offense will be the passing attack led by sixth-year, 24-year-old QB Sean Clifford. When healthy, Clifford has been a plus quarterback. Unfortunately, the "when healthy" tag is hugely important with Clifford as injury sapped him of his effectiveness last year after a hot start came to a screeching halt with a back injury in Iowa City. Clifford's top reserves -- surprisingly, Drew Allar and Christian Veilleux -- should both be much more adept than Ta'Quan Roberson proved in 2021. But if they need to play, 2022 is probably a year full of growing pains.

Clifford gets to throw to a deep receiving corps led by NFL-bound Parker Washington who looks ready to ascend into the role left vacant by Jahan Dotson. Western Kentucky transfer Mitchell Tinsley steps into a starting role after an explosive 2021 season that included absolutely roasting Michigan State's secondary. Third receiver KeAndre Lambert-Smith grabbed the #1 jersey and looks overqualified as a third banana. Big Canadian Malick Meiga and Alabamian Harrison "Trey" Wallace should fill out the group with solid depth. If blue chipper Kaden Saunders can force his way onto the field, the group looks even better.

Just as important as the receivers, Penn State's tight end room features laughable depth with all three of Brenton Strange, Theo Johnson, and Tyler Warren deserving starter's reps thanks to their experience and pedigree. Hopefully offensive coordinator Mike Yurcich utilizes the tight ends even more in 2022.

Of course, all of the players above only get to produce if the offensive line gives Clifford time. The line has enjoyed tons of offseason helium in recent years before disappointing ever year. This year's line features three new starters in LT Olu Fashanu, LG Landon Tengall, and RG Saleem Wormley. Returning starters C Juice Scruggs and RT Caedan Wallace combined with key reserves OT Bryce Effner and G Hunter Nourzad provide just enough bodies to withstand an injury or two without collapsing. However, the starting unit needs to produce in order for the team to push for a return to double-digit wins in 2022.

They should get some help from a pair of explosive newcomers in the backfield. Gatorade National Player of the Year Nicholas Singleton brings burst to the backfield as does fellow true freshman Kaytron Allen. The youngsters were so impressive in camp that fourth-year RB Caziah Holmes transferred to Florida State last week. Hopefully Keyvone Lee is relegated to a change-of-pace role around the goalline with the freshmen carrying most of the load. 

In the end, the quarterback room should produce and the other skill players give the quarterbacks a chance to be a plus offense. This only matters if the offensive line can push defensive lines around and keep Clifford upright. Will that happen? Cross your fingers.

Defense

The 2022 defense features the best secondary I've seen in my time as a Penn State fan, even with the loss of elite safety Jaquan Brisker. Ji'Ayir "Tig" Brown is ready to step into Brisker's role as the leader of the secondary, and Penn State has two high-ceiling options to replace the other safety spot in Zakee Wheatley and Jaylen Reed along with steady upperclassman Keaton Ellis providing depth. While Wheatley and Reed are inexperienced, both come with the athletic profile desired for premium starters. Wheatley began his career as a cornerback, but he transitioned to safety given the loaded group on the edge of the defense. Joey Porter Jr. is getting first-round buzz, returning starter Kalen King should improve in his second year, former South Carolina starter Johnny Dixon was apparently a star of fall camp, and Marquis Wilson is finally back using his elite athleticism at corner after splitting time on offense. Daequan Hardy owns the slot and has produced far more than expected already. There is star power and depth in the defensive backfield.

That is not the case at linebacker. Curtis Jacobs will be expected to carry a heavy load and, candidly, he is probably the player Penn State can least afford to lose to injury. There simply isn't another linebacker ready to play with his athletic ability. Jonathan Sutherland moved up from safety to the other starting outside linebacker spot in Manny Diaz's defense, but Sutherland doesn't figure to play a ton of snaps given the amount of time that Penn State spends in a 4-2-5 alignment. Reserves Charlie Katshir and Jamari Buddin aren't pushing for reps, so linebacker depth is lacking unless and until hulking freshman Abdul Carter is ready to get on the field; so it goes with all three of Brandon Smith, Ellis Brooks, and Jesse Luketa now in the NFL. The middle linebacker battle between Tyler Elsdon and Kobe King was won by Elsdon, but MLB will likely be the weakest spot in the defense.

Thankfully for the linebackers, the defensive line figures to make life easy on the linebackers behind them. Defensive tackle PJ Mustipher was voted second-team All Big Ten by the coaches in 2021 despite missing six games with a torn ACL, speaking to his primacy on the line. Thankfully, the rest of the tackle rotation got key experience in Mustipher's absence, so Coziah Izzard, D'Von Ellis, the returning Hakeem Beamon, and even Jordan van den Berg and emergent true freshman Zane Durant provide a solid rotation at DT. The defensive end position is finally back to being in great shape even with Zuriah Fisher's injury. Between Adisa Isaac, Nick Tarburton, Maryland transfer Chop Robinson, Smith Vilbert, and incoming five-star freshman Dani Dennis-Sutton, the Nittany ends should be able to continually pressure opposing quarterbacks.

Special Teams

Colgate transfer Barney Amor is a huge step down from Jordan Stout at punter; Stout was the first punter selected in the NFL draft whereas Amor has only played one season of college football. Hopefully 280-pound freshman Gabe Nwosu gets into a game or two! Unfortunately, freshman Alex Bacchetta is headed for a redshirt season, far from winning a job.

The placekicking job is concerning. Redshirt senior Jake Pinegar has never produced at a plus level and he even lost his job last year to Stout despite Stout's continued struggles on field goals and extra points. Redshirt freshman Sander Sahaydak couldn't beat out Pinegar; there's a lot of hope here but not a lot of confidence.

Coaching

James Franklin had a good offseason as he tends to do. Hopefully he doesn't commit costly blunders on Saturdays (or a Thursday) this year.

There will likely be some growing pains in the transition from Brent Pry (now the head coach at Virginia Tech) to Diaz as defensive coordinator. Again, hopefully those aren't too notable with a pair of road trips in September.

With Yurcich back helming the offense again, continuity on that side of the ball we be a welcome change after rolling through Joe Moorhead, Ricky Rahne, and Kirk Ciarocca before Yurcich arrived last year.

Predictions

@ Purdue - W 38-20

Vegas has the line close in this one (PSU -3), but I'm not sure why. Injuries may derail the Penn State season in 2022, but the team is healthy in Week One and heads to Purdue with a decided advantage everywhere. Penn State's passing offense should carve up Purdue's secondary which will feature two new starters from the Transfer Portal. Purdue's desire to pass with sixth-year QB Aidan O'Connell plays into the strength of the Penn State defense while Purdue's miserable rushing attack likely won't expose Nittany's weak linebacking corps -- wait until October for that. George Karlaftis isn't here to put pressure on Clifford and neither Rondale Moore nor David Bell is here to prop up the passing attack.

v. Ohio - W 48-10

Penn State should easily outclass Ohio.

@ Auburn - W 35-17

There is a lot of bad energy around the Auburn program these days; not so with Penn State. I think that the Nittany Lions roll here, too.

v. Central Michigan - W 52-10

Just like Ohio, this one shouldn't be close.

v. Northwestern - W 31-20

Northwestern looked awfully spunky against Nebraska, but Penn State's secondary should make the difference here.

@ Michigan - L 17-42

Looks like another disastrous trip to Ann Arbor. Michigan will run at will against the Penn State defense, and Michigan's defensive front will likely make the Penn State offense one dimensional. That's a recipe for failure.

v. Minnesota - L 24-28

Franklin has done a miserable job over the years rebounding from a loss. PJ Fleck's squad will be well-positioned to take advantage. This one will sting, especially as the first true Whiteout failure since 2015.

v. Ohio State - L 30-23

Franklin's teams always play Ohio State tought but almost always come up just short. 2022 looks like more of the same.

@ Indiana - W 24-10

An angry Penn State team gets back on track.

v. Maryland - W 30-20

An angry Penn State team stays on track.

@ Rutgers - W 40-7

Rutgers is very bad and I don't think Greg Schiano can compete.

v. Michigan State - L 24-21

The way of the world. Barf.

Tuesday, June 28, 2022

B1G Football Scheduling Proposal

It's no secret that the Big Ten is considering blowing up its football divisions and thank goodness: the East's relative dominance over the West has rendered the divisional format uninteresting. With the possibility of divisions being obliterated, the B1G will need to retool its scheduling. There are really only a trio of key considerations for me:

  1. Protect key rivalries. Duh. This means UM-OSU, UM-MSU, NEB-IOW, MIN-WIS, etc. have to play every year.
  2. Ensure that teams play regularly. Every team should play every other team in the conference at least once every two years. This probably isn't a key issue for the B1G, but it sure is for me!
  3. Nine conference games annually. More conference games is better than fewer conference games.
This leaves me with a few options:
  1. Divisions. Divisions get a lot of hate and rightfully so: the East-West split has yielded a laughable imbalance of power. That said, divisions largely ensure that historical rivalries are protected and that teams play somewhat regularly. We could probably do worse.
  2. Pods. With 14 teams, we'd probably need three pods: one four-team pod and two five-team pods. Obviously mathematically pods work better with 16 teams. But I'll see if this works.
  3. Protected Rivalry(ies). Ensure that a couple of key games happen every year, then rotate.
  4. Free-for-all. Just go nuts.
Before embarking on this endeavor, I assigned my own highly subjective power rankings to each team in the conference and placed that in parentheses as a way of gauging how fair or unfair any proposal may be. Here goes.

I even had a laughable idea: what if we did divisions alphabetically?

Division A
Illinois (13)
Indiana (12)
Iowa (6)
Maryland (11)
Michigan (2)
Michigan State (5)
Minnesota (7)

Division Z
Nebraska (8)
Northwestern (9)
Ohio State (1)
Penn State (3)
Purdue (10)
Rutgers (14)
Wisconsin (4)

The total for Division A is 56 whereas Division Z is 49. Not bad! That is compared to the current East (57) versus West (48) alignment. Of course, the biggest problem with the current format is the fact that #s 1, 2, 3, and 5 are all in the East; this format provides more of a split even if Division Z appears a bit tougher and has the chance to get much tougher if Nebraska ever reemerges, though I've already given them some inflation here.

Still, we can do better.

Pods
This is the hot idea in college football, so how well does it apply to the B1G? I don't know. Here's my thought:

Geographical Pods
Pod A (West)
Nebraska (8)
Iowa (6)
Minnesota (7)
Wisconsin (4)
Illinois (13)

Pod B (East)
Ohio State (1)
Penn State (3)
Maryland (11)
Rutgers (14)

Pod C (Rest)
Michigan (2)
Michigan State (5)
Northwestern (9)
Purdue (10)
Indiana (12)

The balance here is pretty solid: the West and the Rest average team is 7.6th whereas the East average team is 7.25th. The biggest problems: the East is comically at the extremes and I split the Illinois teams.

This split is tremendous news for Michigan State, who loses an annual game with both OSU and PSU in favor of NU/Derp/IU. Even with Sparty's longstanding issues against Northwestern, that looks awfully tasty.

But this thing doesn't even get off the ground. In years where the Rest pod is playing itself and the West pod, Michigan and OSU don't play; that's a non-starter for the B1G. If I move another team to the East pod, I end up with the same problem, just from OSU's vantage point.

Let's try something else:

Power Ranking Pods
Pod A
Ohio State (1)
Rutgers (14)
Iowa (6)
Northwestern (9)
Nebraska (8)

Pod B
Michigan (2)
Illinois (13)
Michigan State (5)
Purdue (10)
Minnesota (7)

Pod C
Penn State (3)
Indiana (12)
Wisconsin (4)
Maryland (11)

I took the teams in the B1G and set this up like a March Madness tourney: best plays worst, next best plays next worst, and so on. I still have rivalry-related issues. I have Ohio State playing exclusively garbage. That's not fun.

Protected Rivalries
I started with a radical concept: what if we give each team three rivals instead of two? Call them "protected games" or "annual opponents" or whatever you want. That was fun but had holes, so I moved to four rivals in order to protect as many rivalry games as possible. Here goes:

Illinois: Northwestern, Purdue, Nebraska, Ohio State
Indiana: Purdue, Michigan State, Rutgers, Maryland
Iowa: Nebraska, Wisconsin, Northwestern, Minnesota
Maryland: Rutgers, Penn State, Purdue, Indiana
Michigan: Ohio State, Michigan State, Minnesota, Northwestern
Michigan State: Michigan, Penn State, Indiana, Purdue
Minnesota: Wisconsin, Michigan, Nebraska, Iowa
Nebraska: Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Wisconsin
Northwestern: Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, Michigan
Ohio State: Michigan, Penn State, Rutgers, Illinois
Penn State: Ohio State, Michigan State, Maryland, Rutgers
Purdue: Indiana, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan State
Rutgers: Maryland, Ohio State, Indiana, Penn State
Wisconsin: Minnesota, Northwestern, Iowa, Nebraska

We may be onto something here. The only "rivalry" game that isn't protected is the Governor's Victory Bell between Minny and Nittany and they play only every other year at this point anyway. Because I want to really run this to ground, let's look at each team individually:

Illinois: Northwestern, Purdue, Nebraska, Ohio State
Incredibly, Illinois has three matchups to protect: the Illini have played all three of Northwestern (Land of Lincoln Trophy), Ohio State (Illibuck), and Purdue (Purdue Cannon) 95+ times. Their games are protected here with Nebraska a nice bonus.

Indiana: Purdue, Michigan State, Rutgers, Maryland
Indiana is easier with whom to deal: Purdue (Old Oaken Bucket) is the only game that really needs protecting, but it's nice to catch Sparty (Old Brass Spittoon) as well. Rutgers and Maryland are an homage to their days in the cellar of the B1G East.

Iowa: Nebraska, Wisconsin, Northwestern, Minnesota
Iowa was the secondary inspiration for the move from three to four protected games due to Nebraska (Heroes Trophy), Wisconsin (Heartland Trophy), and Minnesota (Floyd of Rosedale) all being meaningful rivalries, and Northwestern desperately needing a meaningful protected opponent. This list ends up pretty much like the B1G West has for years, but it helps that Iowa will still have to cycle through OSU/UM/MSU/PSU more regularly.

Maryland: Rutgers, Penn State, Purdue, Indiana
Maryland only needed Penn State. Rutgers makes sense somewhat for timing and geography. Purdue and Indiana are meh. Maryland really lacks meaningful rivals. That's true regardless of scheduling format.

Michigan: Ohio State, Michigan State, Minnesota, Northwestern
The first three rivalries are all big ones with Ohio State (The Game), Michigan State (Paul Bunyan), and Minnesota (the Little Brown Jug). I don't even know what the George Jewett Trophy is, but again, Northwestern needed a big rival.

Michigan State: Michigan, Penn State, Indiana, Purdue
Great, great list for Sparty. Paul Bunyan + Land Grant Trophy + Spittoon. Purdue also exists and geography plays well here.

Minnesota: Wisconsin, Michigan, Nebraska, Iowa
Minny really needed to protect Wisconsin (Paul Bunyan's Axe), Michigan (the Little Brown Jug), Nebraska ($5 Bits of Broken Chair Trophy), and Iowa (Floyd of Rosedale). Minny was the primary spur for the move to four.

Nebraska: Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Wisconsin
Gotta keep building these new western rivalries. Illinois might be weak here, but it helps the Illini to have Nebraska around.

Northwestern: Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, Michigan
A strong list for the Wildcats. Illinois was the only essential game to protect, but keeping Wisconsin makes geographic sense and they've had a number of quality games against Michigan in the last few decades.

Ohio State: Michigan, Penn State, Rutgers, Illinois
Michigan and Penn State make tons of sense. As noted above, Illibuck is a pretty big matchup. Rutgers is here to (i) throw Rutgers a bone, and (ii) get Ohio State near NYC every other year.

Penn State: Ohio State, Michigan State, Maryland, Rutgers
A real bummer not to have Michigan on this list, but these four are no-brainers to me. Ohio State and Michigan State have become rivals over PSU's decades in the B1G whereas Maryland and Rutgers are natural geographic and recruiting rivals. Plus, Maryland and Rutgers both needed big rivals and PSU qualifies.

Purdue: Indiana, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan State
Indiana is the only essential game to protect. Illinois and Sparty both make some sense. Maryland helps Purdue get to four protected games.

Rutgers: Maryland, Ohio State, Indiana, Penn State
Maryland, Ohio State, and Penn State all make sense for reasons stated above. Indiana gets them to four.

Wisconsin: Minnesota, Northwestern, Iowa, Nebraska
Wisky's list is tremendous: Paul Bunyan's Axe, a solid matchup with Northwestern, Heartland Trophy, and Freedom Trophy.

really like this approach. It gets at the heart of what makes college football fun: rivalries, sometimes ridiculous ones. So how would this play out? Let's look at what a Nittany schedule might look like over a few years:

Year 1
@ Ohio State
vs. Michigan State
@ Maryland
vs. Rutgers
@ Illinois
vs. Indiana
@ Iowa
vs. Michigan
@ Minnesota

Year 2
vs. Ohio State
@ Michigan State
vs. Maryland
@ Rutgers
vs. Nebraska
@ Northwestern
vs. Purdue
@ Wisconsin
vs. Illinois

Year 3
@ Ohio State
vs. Michigan State
@ Maryland
vs. Rutgers
@ Indiana
vs. Iowa
@ Michigan
vs. Minnesota
@ Nebraska

Year 4
vs. Ohio State
@ Michigan State
vs. Maryland
@ Rutgers
vs. Northwestern
@ Purdue
vs. Wisconsin
@ Illinois
vs. Indiana

Man, I really like this idea. Teams never go more than three years without playing a home-and-home with every team in the conference and we protect all of the meaningful rivalries in the conference. Yes, we also protect games that we don't necessarily need to protect, but that doesn't seem like a real problem to me. Some fans may complain that protecting, say, Purdue-Maryland, is a bad thing for the conference. My counter? Both squads will still cycle through every other opponent in the conference every two years and, as a bonus. some new rivalries may develop.

Full disclosure: I didn't know how this would go before I started, but I love the way that this ended.